Cited by 53Electronic Health Records SystemsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

A Trial of Automated Safety Alerts for Inpatient Digoxin Use with Computerized Physician Order Entry

Open access
Galanter, W. L.·2004·Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Automated clinical decision support (CDS) has shown promise in improving safe medication use. The authors performed a trial of CDS, given both during computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and in response to new laboratory results, comparing the time courses of clinician behaviors related to digoxin use before and after implementation of the alerts. DESIGN: Alerts were implemented to notify of the potential risk from low electrolyte concentrations or unknown digoxin or electrolyte concentrations during CPOE. Alerts were also generated in response to newly reported hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia in patients given digoxin. MEASUREMENTS: Clinician responses to the alerts for six months were compared with responses to similar situations for six months prior to implementation. RESULTS: During CPOE, checking for unknown serum values increased after implementation compared with control at one hour: 19% vs. 6% for digoxin, 57% vs. 9% for potassium, and 40% vs. 12% for magnesium as well as at 24 hours (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Electrolyte supplementation increased with newly reported hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia after implementation at one hour: 35% vs. 6% and 49% vs. 5% for potassium and magnesium, respectively, as well as at 24 hours (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). During CPOE, supplementation for hypokalemia was not improved, whereas supplementation for hypomagnesemia improved at one hour (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, the alerts improved the safe use of digoxin. During CPOE, alerts associated with missing levels were effective. For hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia, the alerts given during CPOE were not as effective as those given at the time of newly reported low electrolytes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1197/jamia.m1500

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPOE systems prevent some types of errors while creating or propagating new ones.

    “CPOE systems prevent some types of errors while creating or propagating new ones.4,5,21,22,24,25,33,54 -61”

    From Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry (2006) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says CPOE combined with basic clinical decision support decreases the likelihood of serious medication errors. Neither that passage nor the Discussion (page unavailable) says CPOE creates or propagates new errors; the Discussion addresses alerts that clinicians may ignore, not errors caused by CPOE. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galanter, W. L.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Galanter, W. L.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2004-04-02
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
270-277
ISSN
  • 1067-5027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-974X
OpenAlex
W1847211935
Cited by
53
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
16.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
digoxin, automated clinical decision support, computerized physician order entry, safety alerts, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, electrolyte supplementation, inpatient medication safety
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Digoxin, Drug Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Electrolytes, Hospital Information Systems, Humans, Medical Audit, Medical Staff, Hospital, Medication Errors, Medication Systems, Hospital, Safety, User-Computer Interface, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review