Cited by 95Disability Education and EmploymentEmployment and Welfare StudiesMental Health and Patient Involvement

The future of supported employment for people with severe mental illness

Drake, Robert E., Bond, Gary R.·2008·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Abstract

This paper reviews current research on innovative attempts to improve the dissemination and effectiveness of supported employment. The domains of active investigation include: (1) organization and financing of services, (2) disability policies, (3) program implementation and quality, (4) motivation, (5) job development, (6) illness-related barriers, (7) job supports, (8) career development, and (9) new populations. Work in each of these areas offers the promise of improving services and outcomes in the near future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2975/31.4.2008.367.376

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pioneering studies, such as IMPACT and PROSPECT, have identified core 'ingredients' of collaborative care: (1) virtual or actual co-location of mental health expertise within primary care settings; (2) multidisciplinary teams; (3) measurement-based care to monitor treatment adherence, efficacy and tolerability; (4) engagement of family care-givers to respond to both person-focused and family-centr

    “Pioneering studies, such as IMPACT 695 and PROSPECT, 577 have identified core 'ingredients' of collaborative care: (1) virtual or actual co-location of mental health expertise within primary care settings (e.g., through telepsychiatry or placement of mental health specialists, such as social workers or psychiatric nurses, within clinics); (2) multidisciplinary teams; (3) measurement-based care”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drake, R. E., & Bond, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2008
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
367-376
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
OpenAlex
W2071748850
Cited by
95
References
94
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
29.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
supported employment, severe mental illness, psychiatric rehabilitation, disability policy, program implementation, motivation, employment development, employment support, career development, service dissemination
MeSH terms
Workforce, Mental Disorders, Forecasting, Humans, Public Policy, Rehabilitation, Vocational, United States, Employment, Supported, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review