The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
Abstract
Thank you very much for downloading introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. As you may know, people have search numerous times for their favorite books like this introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing, but end up in harmful downloads. Rather than enjoying a good book with a cup of coffee in the afternoon, instead they cope with some harmful bugs inside their laptop.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0022658 · Cited by 3,060
At what sample size do correlations stabilize?
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009 · Cited by 2,232
A better lemon squeezer? maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables.
Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.1.54 · Cited by 1,788
Bem, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021524 · Cited by 893
Parks, B. W., Nam, E., Org, E., Kostem, E., Norheim, F., Hui, S. T., Pan, C., Civelek, M., Rau, C. D., Bennett, B. J., et al. (2013) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.007 · Cited by 544
When is hub gene selection better than standard meta-analysis?
Langfelder, P., Mischel, P. S., & Horvath, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061505 · Cited by 313
Occipital gamma activation during Vipassana meditation
Cahn, B. R., Delorme, A., & Polich, J. (2010) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0352-1 · Cited by 300
Impact of state anxiety on the interaction between threat monitoring and cognition
Choi, J. M., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.102 · Cited by 137
Cartwright-Hatton, S., McNally, D., Field, A. P., Rust, S., Laskey, B., Dixon, C., Gallagher, B., Harrington, R., Miller, C., Pemberton, K., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2010.12.015 · Cited by 146
Responsibility and obsessive–compulsive disorder: An experimental test
Arntz, A., Voncken, M., & Goosen, A. C. A. (2007) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.016 · Cited by 140
The corollary discharge in humans is related to synchronous neural oscillations
Chen, C.-M. A., Mathalon, D. H., Roach, B. J., Cavus, I., Spencer, D. D., & Ford, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21589 · Cited by 86
The Impact of APA and AERA Guidelines on effect size reporting
Peng, C.-Y. J., Chen, L.-T., Chiang, H.-M., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9218-2 · Cited by 46
FIDO2 the Rescue? Platform vs. Roaming Authentication on Smartphones
Würsching, L., Putz, F., Haesler, S., & Hollick, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580993 · Cited by 17
Wilcox, R. R. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa742 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Venue
- Technometrics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525-526
- ISSN
- 0040-1706 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2511000912
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
