Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A prospective phase II study on photodynamic therapy with photofrin II for centrally located early-stage lung cancer. The Japan Lung Cancer Photodynamic Therapy Study Group.

Furuse, K, Fukuoka, M, Kato, H, Horai, T, Kubota, K, Kodama, N, Kusunoki, Y, Takifuji, N, Okunaka, T, Konaka, C·1993·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: A phase II study was conducted between June 1989 and February 1992 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with photofrin II in centrally located early-stage lung cancer and to determine the complete response (CR) rate as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had histologically proven lung cancer and endoscopically superficial thickening or small protrusions. All lesions were located in subsegmental or larger bronchi. All patients had a performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 and arterial oxygen pressure tension (PaO2) > or = 60 mm Hg. No lymph node or distant metastases were present. All patients received photofrin II (2 mg/kg) intravenously 48 hours before PDT. Tumor lesions were superficially photoradiated by an argon dye laser or an excimer dye laser. RESULTS: Of 54 patients with 64 carcinomas, 51 with 61 carcinomas were eligible for toxicity evaluation and 49 with 59 carcinomas were assessable for response. Of the 59 assessable carcinomas, 50 (84.8%; 95% confidence interval, 73.0% to 92.8%) showed a CR after initial PDT. The median duration of CR was 14.0+ months (range, 2.0+ to 32.4+). The multiple regression model indicates that estimated length of longitudinal tumor extent was the only independent prognostic factor for CR (P = .002). Five carcinomas that had a CR had a local recurrence at 6, 10, 12, 16, and 18 months after initial PDT, respectively. Toxicity assessment (World Health Organization [WHO] grade 2) showed transient elevation of ALT (1.9%), pulmonary toxicity (7.7%), and allergic reaction (7.7%), as well as sunburn (1.9%). CONCLUSION: PDT with photofrin II has an excellent effect on patients with centrally located early-stage lung cancer who have limited tumor invasion extending over a small area (< or = 1 cm).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1993.11.10.1852

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 283

Metadata

Authors
Furuse, K., Fukuoka, M., Kato, H., Horai, T., Kubota, K., Kodama, N., Kusunoki, Y., Takifuji, N., Okunaka, T., & Konaka, C.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1993-10
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
1852-1857
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2225649561
Cited by
283
References
11
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective phase II study on photodynamic therapy with photofrin II for centrally located early-stage lung cancer. The Japan Lung Cancer Photodynamic Therapy Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1993.11.10.1852
The paper
Furuse, K., Fukuoka, M., Kato, H., Horai, T., Kubota, K., Kodama, N., Kusunoki, Y., Takifuji, N., Okunaka, T., & Konaka, C. (1993). A prospective phase II study on photodynamic therapy with photofrin II for centrally located early-stage lung cancer. The Japan Lung Cancer Photodynamic Therapy Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1993.11.10.1852

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.