The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Familial Invasive Breast Cancers: Worse Outcome Related to BRCA1 Mutations
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although all studies confirm that BRCA1 tumors are highly proliferative and poorly differentiated, their outcomes remain controversial. We propose to examine, through a cohort study, the pathologic characteristics, overall survival, local recurrence, and metastasis-free intervals of 40 patients with BRCA1 breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 183 patients with invasive breast cancer, treated at the Institut Curie and presenting with a familial history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, were tested for BRCA1 germ-line mutation. Tumor characteristics and clinical events were extracted from our prospectively registered database. RESULTS: Forty BRCA1 mutations were found among the 183 patients (22%). Median follow-up was 58 months. BRCA1 tumors were larger in size (P = .03), had a higher rate of grade 3 histoprognostic factors (P = .002), and had a higher frequency of negative estrogen (P = .003) and progesterone receptors (P = .002) compared with non-BRCA1 tumors. Overall survival was poorer for carriers than for noncarriers (5-year rate, 80% v 91%, P = .002). Because a long time interval between cancer diagnosis and genetic counseling artificially increases survival time due to unrecorded deaths, the analysis was limited to the 110 patients whose diagnosis-to-counseling interval was less than 36 months (19 BRCA1 patients and 91 non-BRCA1 patients). The differences between the BRCA1 and non-BRCA1 groups regarding overall survival and metastasis-free interval were dramatically increased (49% v 85% and 18% v 84%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that BRCA1 mutation was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Our results strongly support that among patients with familial breast cancer, those who have a BRCA1 mutation have a worse outcome than those who do not.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1
Verhoog, L., Brekelmans, C., Seynaeve, C., van den Bosch, L., Dahmen, G., van Geel, A., Tilanus-Linthorst, M., Bartels, C., Wagner, A., van den Ouweland, A., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)07065-7 · Cited by 452
Survival of BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer patients: a population-based study from southern Sweden.
Jóhannsson, O. T., Ranstam, J., Borg, A., & Olsson, H. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.2.397 · Cited by 254
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1126/science.7545954 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/378789a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng0396-333 · DOI · Paper page
- Jacquemier J, Eisinger F, Birnbaum D, et al: Histoprognostic grade in -associated breast cancer. Lancet 345: 1503,1995 (letter)BRCA1 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960215)77:4<697::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10109-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980715)83:2<310::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/jnci/90.15.1138 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990515)85:10<2200::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
- 10.1002/bjs.1800811038 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-8140(98)00023-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/91.3.259 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.5.1642 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79248-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/91.24.2112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0960-9776(97)90574-9 · DOI
- Cox DR: Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 34: 187,1972-220, · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3653 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3017 · DOI
Cited by
Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study
Copson, E. R., Maishman, T. C., Tapper, W. J., Cutress, R. I., Greville-Heygate, S., Altman, D. G., Eccles, B., Gerty, S., Durcan, L. T., Jones, L., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30891-4 · Cited by 481
Katipamula, R., Degnim, A. C., Hoskin, T., Boughey, J. C., Loprinzi, C., Grant, C. S., Brandt, K. R., Pruthi, S., Chute, C. G., Olson, J. E., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.19.4225 · Cited by 373
Robson, M. E., Chappuis, P. O., Satagopan, J., Wong, N., Boyd, J., Goffin, J. R., Hudis, C., Roberge, D., Norton, L., Bégin, L. R., et al. (2003) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr658 · Cited by 307
Clinical Outcomes of Breast Cancer in Carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations
Rennert, G., Bisland-Naggan, S., Barnett-Griness, O., Bar-Joseph, N., Zhang, S., Rennert, H. S., & Narod, S. A. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa070608 · Cited by 302
Malone, K. E., Begg, C. B., Haile, R. W., Borg, A., Concannon, P., Tellhed, L., Xue, S., Teraoka, S., Bernstein, L., Capanu, M., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.24.2495 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Ansquer, Y., Dreyfus, H., Gautier, C., Gauthier-Villars, M., Bourstyn, E., Clough, K. B., Magdelénat, H., Pouillart, P., Vincent-Salomon, A., Fourquet, A., & Asselain, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2000-12-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4053-4059
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1873998261
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Familial Invasive Breast Cancers: Worse Outcome Related to BRCA1 Mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.24.4053
- The paper
- Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Ansquer, Y., Dreyfus, H., Gautier, C., Gauthier-Villars, M., Bourstyn, E., Clough, K. B., Magdelénat, H., Pouillart, P., Vincent-Salomon, A., Fourquet, A., & Asselain, B. (2000). Familial Invasive Breast Cancers: Worse Outcome Related to BRCA1 Mutations. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.24.4053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.