Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Familial Invasive Breast Cancers: Worse Outcome Related to BRCA1 Mutations

Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique, Ansquer, Yan, Dreyfus, Hélène, Gautier, Chantal, Gauthier-Villars, Marion, Bourstyn, Edwige, Clough, Krishna B., Magdelénat, Henri, Pouillart, Pierre, Vincent-Salomon, Anne, Fourquet, Alain, Asselain, Bernard·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although all studies confirm that BRCA1 tumors are highly proliferative and poorly differentiated, their outcomes remain controversial. We propose to examine, through a cohort study, the pathologic characteristics, overall survival, local recurrence, and metastasis-free intervals of 40 patients with BRCA1 breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 183 patients with invasive breast cancer, treated at the Institut Curie and presenting with a familial history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, were tested for BRCA1 germ-line mutation. Tumor characteristics and clinical events were extracted from our prospectively registered database. RESULTS: Forty BRCA1 mutations were found among the 183 patients (22%). Median follow-up was 58 months. BRCA1 tumors were larger in size (P = .03), had a higher rate of grade 3 histoprognostic factors (P = .002), and had a higher frequency of negative estrogen (P = .003) and progesterone receptors (P = .002) compared with non-BRCA1 tumors. Overall survival was poorer for carriers than for noncarriers (5-year rate, 80% v 91%, P = .002). Because a long time interval between cancer diagnosis and genetic counseling artificially increases survival time due to unrecorded deaths, the analysis was limited to the 110 patients whose diagnosis-to-counseling interval was less than 36 months (19 BRCA1 patients and 91 non-BRCA1 patients). The differences between the BRCA1 and non-BRCA1 groups regarding overall survival and metastasis-free interval were dramatically increased (49% v 85% and 18% v 84%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that BRCA1 mutation was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Our results strongly support that among patients with familial breast cancer, those who have a BRCA1 mutation have a worse outcome than those who do not.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.24.4053

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1126/science.7545954 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/378789a0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/ng0396-333 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jacquemier J, Eisinger F, Birnbaum D, et al: Histoprognostic grade in -associated breast cancer. Lancet 345: 1503,1995 (letter)BRCA1 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960215)77:4<697::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)10109-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980715)83:2<310::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/jnci/90.15.1138 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990515)85:10<2200::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  10. 10.1002/bjs.1800811038 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0167-8140(98)00023-1 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/jnci/91.3.259 · DOI
  13. 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.5.1642 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79248-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/jnci/91.24.2112 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0960-9776(97)90574-9 · DOI
  17. Cox DR: Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 34: 187,1972-220, · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.11.3653 · DOI
  19. 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3017 · DOI

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Ansquer, Y., Dreyfus, H., Gautier, C., Gauthier-Villars, M., Bourstyn, E., Clough, K. B., Magdelénat, H., Pouillart, P., Vincent-Salomon, A., Fourquet, A., & Asselain, B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-12-15
Volume
18
Issue
24
Pages
4053-4059
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1873998261
Cited by
174
References
2
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Familial Invasive Breast Cancers: Worse Outcome Related to BRCA1 Mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.24.4053
The paper
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D., Ansquer, Y., Dreyfus, H., Gautier, C., Gauthier-Villars, M., Bourstyn, E., Clough, K. B., Magdelénat, H., Pouillart, P., Vincent-Salomon, A., Fourquet, A., & Asselain, B. (2000). Familial Invasive Breast Cancers: Worse Outcome Related to BRCA1 Mutations. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.24.4053

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.