Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Locoregional Radiation Therapy Improve Survival in Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis

Whelan, Timothy J., Julian, Jim, Wright, Jim, Jadad, Alejandro R., Levine, Mark L.·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent randomized trials in women with node-positive breast cancer who received systemic treatment report that locoregional radiation therapy improves survival. Previous trials failed to detect a difference in survival that results from its use. A systematic review of randomized trials that examine the effectiveness of locoregional radiation therapy in patients treated by definitive surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy was conducted. METHODS: Randomized trials published between 1967 and 1999 were identified through MEDLINE database, CancerLit database, and reference lists of relevant articles. Relevant data was abstracted. The results of randomized trials were pooled using meta-analyses to estimate the effect of treatment on any recurrence, locoregional recurrence, and mortality. RESULTS: Eighteen trials that involved a total of 6,367 patients were identified. Most trials included both pre- and postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy. The type of systemic therapy received, sites irradiated, techniques used, and doses of radiation delivered varied between trials. Data on toxicity were infrequently reported. Radiation was shown to reduce the risk of any recurrence (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.83), local recurrence (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.34), and mortality (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.94). CONCLUSION: Locoregional radiation after surgery in patients treated with systemic therapy reduced mortality. Several questions remain on how these results should be translated into current-day clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.6.1220

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.3.447 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1056/NEJM199511303332202 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1056/NEJM199710023371401 · DOI
  4. 10.1056/NEJM199710023371402 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09201-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1056/NEJM199710023371408 · DOI
  7. 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2886 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/annonc/5.suppl_5.209 · DOI
  9. 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.11.3493 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1056/NEJM199206253262605 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/1097-0142(19810301)47:5<877::AID-CNCR2820470511>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90280-4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/1097-0142(19931201)72:11<3248::AID-CNCR2820721119>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  14. 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.6.942 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01348.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1017/S0266462300008916 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/sim.4780140406 · DOI
  18. 10.1056/NEJM199511303332202 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1056/NEJM199511303332202 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1002/1097-0142(1984)54:4<670::AID-CNCR2820540414>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/1097-0142(19870901)60:5<936::AID-CNCR2820600504>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  22. 10.1056/NEJM199511303332202 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/bjc.1992.430 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/1097-0142(19810615)47:12<2833::AID-CNCR2820471214>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BF01980937 · DOI
  26. Schmoor C, Bastert G, Bojar H, et al: Effect of radiotherapy in addition to 6 cycles CMF in node positive breast cancer patients: German Breast Cancer Study Group (GBSG). Eur J Cancer 34:S59,1998 (suppl 5, abstr) · DOI
  27. 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.10.1546 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/bjs.1800680413 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/bjs.1800730407 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/BF01855128 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90015-T · DOI
  32. 10.1097/00000421-198208000-00005 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90714-4 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970315)79:6<1138::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  35. 10.3109/02841867909128213 · DOI
  36. 10.3109/02841869209088914 · DOI
  37. 10.3109/02841869309092445 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90214-5 · DOI
  39. 10.3109/02841868809091772 · DOI
  40. 10.1136/bmj.298.6688.1611 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90784-F · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/0167-8140(92)90190-6 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0009-9260(89)80099-6 · DOI
  44. 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.9.1662 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90169-V · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)93004-K · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1001/jama.1995.03530100085040 · DOI
  48. 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.10.2229 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Whelan, T. J., Julian, J., Wright, J., Jadad, A. R., & Levine, M. L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-03-13
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1220-1229
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1857442781
Cited by
507
References
1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Locoregional Radiation Therapy Improve Survival in Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.6.1220
The paper
Whelan, T. J., Julian, J., Wright, J., Jadad, A. R., & Levine, M. L. (2000). Does Locoregional Radiation Therapy Improve Survival in Breast Cancer? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.6.1220

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.