Cited by 734Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment

Phase II Trial of Gefitinib in Recurrent Glioblastoma

Open access
Rich, Jeremy N., Reardon, David A., Peery, Terry, Dowell, Jeannette M., Quinn, Jennifer A., Penne, Kara L., Wikstrand, Carol J., Van Duyn, Lauren B. +12 more·2004·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib (ZD1839, Iressa; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE), a novel epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients and Methods: This was an open-label, single-center phase II trial. Fifty-seven patients with first recurrence of a glioblastoma who were previously treated with surgical resection, radiation, and usually chemotherapy underwent an open biopsy or resection at evaluation for confirmation of tumor recurrence. Each patient initially received 500 mg of gefitinib orally once daily; dose escalation to 750 mg then 1,000 mg, if a patient received enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs or dexamethasone, was allowed within each patient. Results: Although no objective tumor responses were seen among the 53 assessable patients, only 21% of patients (11 of 53 patients) had measurable disease at treatment initiation. Seventeen percent of patients (nine of 53 patients) underwent at least six 4-week cycles, and the 6-month event-free survival (EFS) was 13% (seven of 53 patients). The median EFS time was 8.1 weeks, and the median overall survival (OS) time from treatment initiation was 39.4 weeks. Adverse events were generally mild (grade 1 or 2) and consisted mainly of skin reactions and diarrhea. Drug-related toxicities were more frequent at higher doses. Withdrawal caused by drug-related adverse events occurred in 6% of patients (three of 53 patients). Although the presence of diarrhea positively predicted favorable OS from treatment initiation, epidermal growth factor receptor expression did not correlate with either EFS or OS. Conclusion: Gefitinib is well tolerated and has activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Further study of this agent at higher doses is warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2004.08.110

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib have failed to demonstrate efficacy in GBM, largely as a consequence of persistent PI3K signaling due to PTEN loss and/or coactivation of other receptor tyrosine kinases.

    “Despite the compelling nature of EGFR as a drug target in GBM, the EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib have failed to demonstrate efficacy (9–11), in large part as a consequence of persistent PI3K signaling due to PTEN loss and/or coactivation of other receptor tyrosine kinases (9, 10, 12).”

    From An LXR Agonist Promotes Glioblastoma Cell Death through Inhibition of an EGFR/AKT/SREBP-1/LDLR–Dependent Pathway (2011) · cites this paper as [11]

    In “Measurement of Therapeutic Effect, Time to Progression, and Survival” (page unavailable), the gefitinib trial reports no complete or partial responses and frequent progression, supporting limited demonstrated efficacy in recurrent GBM. But “Factors Related to Response, Progression, and Survival” (page unavailable) says erlotinib seemed to show activity; it does not establish persistent PI3K signaling, PTEN loss, or coactivation of other receptor tyrosine kinases as the reason for limited efficacy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The average historical PFS6 based on the above studies is 15.3 ± 3.8%.

    “The average historical PFS6 based on the above studies is 15.3 ± 3.8%”
  • The average historical TTP is 9.5 ± 1.6 weeks.

    “and the average historical TTP is 9.5 ± 1.6 weeks.”
  • Efficacy analysis was performed for 10 recurrent GBM patients by comparing TTP, PFS6, and OS in recurrent GBM patients treated with the NovoTTF-100A device with the TTP, PFS6, and OS of recurrent GBM patients in a literature based historical control group.

    “Efficacy analysis was performed for 10 recurrent GBM patients by comparing TTP, PFS6, and OS in recurrent GBM patients treated with the NovoTTF-100A device with the TTP, PFS6, and OS of recurrent GBM patients in a literature based historical control group (10, 25–28).”
  • The average historical OS is 29.3 ± 6 weeks.

    “OS averaged 29.3 ± 6 weeks (see SI Table 2).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rich, J. N., Reardon, D. A., Peery, T., Dowell, J. M., Quinn, J. A., Penne, K. L., Wikstrand, C. J., Van Duyn, L. B., Dancey, J. E., McLendon, R. E., Kao, J. C., Stenzel, T. T., Ahmed Rasheed, B. K., Tourt-Uhlig, S. E., Herndon, J. E., Vredenburgh, J. J., Sampson, J. H., Friedman, A. H., Bigner, D. D., & Friedman, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • From the Departments of Medicine, Surgery, Pathology, and Cancer Center Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2004-01-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
133-142
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2117941094
Cited by
734
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 48
FWCI
24.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure
  • National Institutes of Health (1r21ca091548-01)
  • National Cancer Institute (R21 CA 91548)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
gefitinib, recurrent glioblastoma, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, event-free survival, overall survival, drug toxicity, diarrhea, EGF receptor expression, dose escalation, enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, dexamethasone
MeSH terms
Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Enzyme Inhibitors, Epidermal Growth Factor, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Quinazolines, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review