Cited by 2,079Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer)

Thatcher, Nick, Chang, Alex, Parikh, Purvish, Rodrigues Pereira, José, Ciuleanu, Tudor, von Pawel, Joachim, Thongprasert, Sumitra, Tan, Eng Huat +3 more·2005·The Lancet

Abstract

Background This placebo-controlled phase III study investigated the effect on survival of gefitinib as second-line or third-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.Methods 1692 patients who were refractory to or intolerant of their latest chemotherapy regimen were randomly assigned in a ratio of two to one either gefitinib (250 mg/day) or placebo, plus best supportive care. The primary endpoint was survival in the overall population of patients and those with adenocarcinoma. The primary analysis of the population for survival was by intention to treat. This study has been submitted for registration with ClinicalTrials.gov, number 1839IL/709.Findings 1129 patients were assigned gefitinib and 563 placebo. At median follow-up of 7.2 months, median survival did not differ significantly between the groups in the overall population (5.6 months for gefitinib and 5.1 months for placebo; hazard ratio 0.89 [95% CI 0.77-1.02], p=0.087) or among the 812 patients with adenocarcinoma (6.3 months vs 5.4 months; 0.84 [0.68-1.03], p=0.089). Preplanned subgroup analyses showed significantly longer survival in the gefitinib group than the placebo group for never-smokers (n=375; 0.67 [0.49-0.92], p=0.012; median survival 8.9 vs 6.1 months) and patients of Asian origin (n=342; 0.66 [0.48-0.91], p=0.01; median survival 9.5 vs 5.5 months). Gefitinib was well tolerated, as in previous studies.Interpretation Treatment with gefitinib was not associated with significant improvement in survival in either coprimary population. There was pronounced heterogeneity in survival outcomes between groups of patients, with some evidence of benefit among never-smokers and patients of Asian origin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67625-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The clinical development of EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC started before the discovery of EGFR mutations, with initial studies of Gefitinib and Erlotinib conducted in unselected patients in both pretreated and treatment-naïve settings in combination with standard chemotherapy.

    “The clinical development of EGFR inhibitors in NSCLC started before the discovery of EGFR mutations, therefore initial studies with Gefitinib and Erlotinib were conducted in unselected patients in both pretreated [52–54] and in treatment-naïve patients in combination with standard chemotherapy [55–58].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thatcher, N., Chang, A., Parikh, P., Rodrigues Pereira, J., Ciuleanu, T., von Pawel, J., Thongprasert, S., Tan, E. H., Pemberton, K., Archer, V., & Carroll, K.
Affiliations
  • The Christie Hospital (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Tata Memorial Hospital (IN)
  • Institute of Oncology Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta (RO)
  • Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital (TH)
  • National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Thatcher, Nick
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
366
Issue
9496
Pages
1527-1537
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2153477391
Cited by
2,079
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 126 · 2014: 126 · 2013: 163 · 2012: 167
FWCI
133.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
gefitinib, non-small cell lung cancer, second-line therapy, third-line therapy, best supportive care, overall survival, never smokers, Asian patients, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, subgroup heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Quinazolines, Survival Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review