The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positron Emission Tomography for Staging of Pediatric Sarcoma Patients: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Trial
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18–fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for initial staging and therapy planning in pediatric sarcoma patients. Patients and Methods: In this prospective multicenter study, 46 pediatric patients (females, n = 22; males, n = 24; age range, 1 to 18 years) with histologically proven sarcoma (Ewing sarcoma family tumors, n = 23; osteosarcoma, n = 11; rhabdomyosarcoma, n = 12) were examined with conventional imaging modalities (CIMs), including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy according to the standardized algorithms of the international therapy optimization trials, and whole-body FDG-PET. A lesion- and patient-based analysis of PET alone and CIMs alone and a side-by-side (SBS) analysis of FDG-PET and CIMs were performed. The standard of reference consisted of all imaging material, follow-up data (mean follow-up time, 24 ± 12 months), and histopathology and was determined by an interdisciplinary tumor board. Results: FDG-PET and CIMs were equally effective in the detection of primary tumors (accuracy, 100%). PET was superior to CIMs concerning the correct detection of lymph node involvement (sensitivity, 95% v 25%, respectively) and bone manifestations (sensitivity, 90% v 57%, respectively), whereas CT was more reliable than FDG-PET in depicting lung metastases (sensitivity, 100% v 25%, respectively). The patient-based analysis revealed the best results for SBS, with 91% correct therapy decisions. This was significantly superior to CIMs (59%; P < .001). Conclusion: In staging pediatric sarcoma, subsidiary FDG-PET scanning depicts important additional information and has a relevant impact on therapy planning when analyzed side-by-side with CIMs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bielack, S. S., Kempf-Bielack, B., Delling, G., Exner, G. U., Flege, S., Helmke, K., Kotz, R., Salzer-Kuntschik, M., Werner, M., Winkelmann, W., et al. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.20.3.776 · Cited by 2,393
Cited by
Grünewald, T. G. P., Cidre-Aranaz, F., Surdez, D., Tomazou, E. M., de Álava, E., Kovar, H., Sorensen, P. H., Delattre, O., & Dirksen, U. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0003-x · Cited by 873
Common Musculoskeletal Tumors of Childhood and Adolescence
Arndt, C. A. S., Rose, P. S., Folpe, A. L., & Laack, N. N. (2012) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.015 · Cited by 298
Meyer, J. S., Nadel, H. R., Marina, N., Womer, R. B., Brown, K. L. B., Eary, J. F., Gorlick, R., Grier, H. E., Randall, R. L., Lawlor, E. R., et al. (2008) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.21596 · Cited by 180
Stanborough, R., Demertzis, J. L., Wessell, D. E., Lenchik, L., Ahlawat, S., Baker, J. C., Banks, J., Caracciolo, J. T., Garner, H. W., Hentz, C., et al. (2022) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.015 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Völker, T., Denecke, T., Steffen, I., Misch, D., Schönberger, S., Plotkin, M., Ruf, J., Furth, C., Stöver, B., Hautzel, H., Henze, G., & Amthauer, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2007-12-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 5435-5441
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2129430773
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.