CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 383Sleep and related disordersCancer survivorship and careSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Controlled Clinical Effectiveness Trial of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Compared With Treatment As Usual for Persistent Insomnia in Patients With Cancer

Espie, Colin A., Fleming, Leanne, Cassidy, James, Samuel, Leslie, Taylor, Lynne M., White, Craig A., Douglas, Neil J., Engleman, Heather M., Kelly, Heidi-Louise, Paul, James·2008·Journal of Clinical Oncology
DOI 10.1200/jco.2007.13.9006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: Persistent insomnia is a common complaint in cancer survivors, but is seldom satisfactorily addressed. The adaptation to cancer care of a validated, cost-effective intervention may offer a practicable solution. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of protocol-driven cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for insomnia, delivered by oncology nurses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Randomized, controlled, pragmatic, two-center trial of CBT versus treatment as usual (TAU) in 150 patients (103 females; mean age, 61 years.) who had completed active therapy for breast, prostate, colorectal, or gynecological cancer. The study conformed to CONSORT guidelines. Primary outcomes were sleep diary measures at baseline, post-treatment, and 6-month follow-up. Actigraphic sleep, health-related quality of life (QOL), psychopathology, and fatigue were secondary measures. CBT comprised five, small group sessions across consecutive weeks, after a manualized protocol. TAU represented normal clinical practice; the appropriate control for a clinical effectiveness study. RESULTS: CBT was associated with mean reductions in wakefulness of 55 minutes per night compared with no change in TAU. These outcomes were sustained 6 months after treatment. Standardized relative effect sizes were large for complaints of difficulty initiating sleep, waking from sleep during the night, and for sleep efficiency (percentage of time in bed spent asleep). CBT was associated with moderate to large effect sizes for five of seven QOL outcomes, including significant reduction in daytime fatigue. There was no significant interaction effect between any of these outcomes and baseline demographic, clinical, or sleep characteristics. CONCLUSION: CBT for insomnia may be both clinically effective and feasible to deliver in real world practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2007.13.9006

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1037/0022-006X.63.1.79 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-006X.63.5.718 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 383

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Espie, C. A., Fleming, L., Cassidy, J., Samuel, L., Taylor, L. M., White, C. A., Douglas, N. J., Engleman, H. M., Kelly, H.-L., & Paul, J.
Affiliations
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Published
2008-10-01
Volume
26
Issue
28
Pages
4651-4658
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
DOI
10.1200/jco.2007.13.9006
OpenAlex
W2132331779
Cited by
383
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 28
FWCI
29.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (C8265/A3036)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, insomnia, cancer survivors, oncology nurses, usual care, sleep efficiency, health-related quality of life, daytime fatigue, psychopathology, breast cancer, prostate cancer, gynecologic cancer, colorectal cancer, sleep diary, actigraphy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Linear Models, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review