Cited by 181Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

Meta-analysis of single-agent chemotherapy compared with combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Di Maio, Massimo, Chiodini, Paolo, Georgoulias, Vassilis, Hatzidaki, Dora, Takeda, Koji, Wachters, Floris M., Gebbia, Vittorio, Smit, Egbert F. +4 more·2009·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Doublet chemotherapy is more effective than single-agent as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As second-line treatment, several randomized trials have been performed comparing single-agent with doublet chemotherapy, but each trial had an insufficient power to detect potentially relevant differences in survival. METHODS: We performed meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials, both published and unpublished, comparing single-agent with doublet chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). All statistical analyses were stratified by trial. RESULTS: Eight eligible trials were identified. Data of two trials were not available, and data of six trials (847 patients) were collected. Median age was 61 years. Performance status was 0 or 1 in 90%; 80% of patients had received previous platin-based chemotherapy. OS was not significantly different between arms (P = .32). Median OS was 37.3 and 34.7 weeks in the doublet and single-agent arms, respectively. Hazard ratio (HR) was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.08). Response rate was 15.1% with doublet and 7.3% with single-agent (P = .0004). Median progression-free survival was 14 weeks for doublet and 11.7 weeks for single agent (P = .0009; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.91). There was no significant heterogeneity among trials for the three efficacy outcomes. Patients treated with doublet chemotherapy had significantly more grade 3 to 4 hematologic (41% v 25%; P < .0001) and grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicity (28% v 22%; P = .034). CONCLUSION: Doublet chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC significantly increases response rate and progression-free survival, but is more toxic and does not improve overall survival compared to single-agent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2008.17.5844

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Maio, M., Chiodini, P., Georgoulias, V., Hatzidaki, D., Takeda, K., Wachters, F. M., Gebbia, V., Smit, E. F., Morabito, A., Gallo, C., Perrone, F., & Gridelli, C.
Affiliations
  • From the Clinical Trials Unit, National Cancer Institute; Department of Medicine and Public Health, Second University of Napoli; Division of Medical Oncology, “N.Giannettasio” Hospital, Rossano; La Maddalena, University of Palermo; Division of Medical Oncology, “S. Giuseppe Moscati” Hospital, Avellino, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center, Groningen; and...
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2009-04-10
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
1836-1843
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2120031407
Cited by
181
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, second-line chemotherapy, doublet chemotherapy, single-agent chemotherapy, overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, chemotherapy toxicity, hematologic toxicity, individual patient data
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review