Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Single-Agent Gemcitabine As First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The GIP-1 Study

Colucci, Giuseppe, Labianca, Roberto, Di Costanzo, Francesco, Gebbia, Vittorio, Cartenì, Giacomo, Massidda, Bruno, Dapretto, Elisa, Manzione, Luigi, Piazza, Elena, Sannicolò, Mirella, Ciaparrone, Marco, Cavanna, Luigi, Giuliani, Francesco, Maiello, Evaristo, Testa, Antonio, Pederzoli, Paolo, Falconi, Massimo, Gallo, Ciro, Di Maio, Massimo, Perrone, Francesco·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Single-agent gemcitabine became standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after demonstration of superiority compared with fluorouracil. The Gruppo Italiano Pancreas 1 randomized phase III trial aimed to compare gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00813696). Patients and Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 50, were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (arm A) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B). Arm A: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 weekly for 7 weeks, and, after a 1-week rest, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Arm B: cisplatin 25 mg/m 2 added weekly to gemcitabine, except cycle 1 day 22. Primary end point was overall survival. To have 8% power of detecting a 0.74 hazard ratio (HR) of death, with bilateral α .05, 355 events were needed and 400 patients planned. Results: Four hundred patients were enrolled (arm A: 199; arm B: 201). Median age was 63, 59% were male, 84% had stage IV, and 83% had KPS ≥ 80. Median overall survival was 8.3 months versus 7.2 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.35; P = .38). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months versus 3.8 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.19; P = .80). The objective response rate was 10.1% in A and 12.9% in B (P = .37). Clinical benefit was experienced by 23.0% in A and 15.1% in B (P = .057). Combination therapy produced more hematologic toxicity, without relevant differences in nonhematologic toxicity. Conclusion: The addition of weekly cisplatin to gemcitabine failed to demonstrate any improvement as first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.25.4433

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Colucci, G., Labianca, R., Di Costanzo, F., Gebbia, V., Cartenì, G., Massidda, B., Dapretto, E., Manzione, L., Piazza, E., Sannicolò, M., Ciaparrone, M., Cavanna, L., Giuliani, F., Maiello, E., Testa, A., Pederzoli, P., Falconi, M., Gallo, C., Di Maio, M., & Perrone, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-04-01
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1645-1651
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2158397794
Cited by
304
References
32
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Single-Agent Gemcitabine As First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The GIP-1 Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.25.4433
The paper
Colucci, G., Labianca, R., Di Costanzo, F., Gebbia, V., Cartenì, G., Massidda, B., Dapretto, E., Manzione, L., Piazza, E., Sannicolò, M., Ciaparrone, M., Cavanna, L., Giuliani, F., Maiello, E., Testa, A., Pederzoli, P., Falconi, M., Gallo, C., Di Maio, M., & Perrone, F. (2010). Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Single-Agent Gemcitabine As First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The GIP-1 Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.25.4433

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.