Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Next-Generation Sequencing Technology Reveals a Characteristic Pattern of Molecular Mutations in 72.8% of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia by Detecting Frequent Alterations in TET2, CBL, RAS, and RUNX1

Kohlmann, Alexander, Grossmann, Vera, Klein, Hans-Ulrich, Schindela, Sonja, Weiss, Tamara, Kazak, Beray, Dicker, Frank, Schnittger, Susanne, Dugas, Martin, Kern, Wolfgang, Haferlach, Claudia, Haferlach, Torsten·2010·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic malignancy that is characterized by features of both a myeloproliferative neoplasm and a myelodysplastic syndrome. Thus far, data on a comprehensive cytogenetic or molecular genetic characterization are limited. Patients and Methods: Here, we analyzed 81 thoroughly characterized patients with CMML (CMML type 1, n = 45; CMML type 2, n = 36) by applying next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to investigate CBL, JAK2, MPL, NRAS, and KRAS at known mutational hotspot regions. In addition, complete coding regions were analyzed for RUNX1 (β isoform) and TET2 aberrations. Results: Cytogenetic aberrations were found in 18.2% of patients (14 of 77 patients). In contrast, at least one molecular mutation was observed in 72.8% of patients (59 of 81 patients). A mean of 1.6 mutations per patient was observed by this unprecedented screening. In total, 105 variances were detected by this comprehensive molecular screening. After excluding known polymorphisms or silent mutations, 82 distinct mutations remained (CBL, n = 15; JAK2V617F, n = 8; MPL, n = 0; NRAS, n = 10; KRAS, n = 12; RUNX1, n = 7; and TET2, n = 41). With respect to clinical data, a better outcome was seen for patients carrying TET2 mutations (P = .013). Conclusion: The number of molecular markers used to categorize myeloid neoplasms is constantly increasing. Here, NGS screening has been demonstrated to support a comprehensive characterization of the molecular background in CMML. A pattern of molecular mutations translates into different biologic and prognostic categories of CMML.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2009.27.1361

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Kohlmann, A., Grossmann, V., Klein, H.-U., Schindela, S., Weiss, T., Kazak, B., Dicker, F., Schnittger, S., Dugas, M., Kern, W., Haferlach, C., & Haferlach, T.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2010-08-20
Volume
28
Issue
24
Pages
3858-3865
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2127332345
Cited by
299
References
27
FWCI
22.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Next-Generation Sequencing Technology Reveals a Characteristic Pattern of Molecular Mutations in 72.8% of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia by Detecting Frequent Alterations in TET2, CBL, RAS, and RUNX1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2009.27.1361
The paper
Kohlmann, A., Grossmann, V., Klein, H.-U., Schindela, S., Weiss, T., Kazak, B., Dicker, F., Schnittger, S., Dugas, M., Kern, W., Haferlach, C., & Haferlach, T. (2010). Next-Generation Sequencing Technology Reveals a Characteristic Pattern of Molecular Mutations in 72.8% of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia by Detecting Frequent Alterations in TET2, CBL, RAS, and RUNX1. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.1361

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.