Cited by 185Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

TET2 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Results From a Comprehensive Genetic and Clinical Analysis of the AML Study Group

Open access
Gaidzik, Verena I., Paschka, Peter, Späth, Daniela, Habdank, Marianne, Köhne, Claus-Henning, Germing, Ulrich, von Lilienfeld-Toal, Marie, Held, Gerhard +8 more·2012·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The tet oncogene family member 2 (TET2) gene was recently identified to be mutated in myeloid disorders including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). To date, there is increasing evidence for a functional role of TET2 mutations (TET2 mut ) in AML. Thus, we explored the frequency, gene-expression pattern, and clinical impact of TET2 mut in a large cohort of patients with AML in the context of other AML-associated aberrations. Patients and Methods: Samples from 783 younger adult patients with AML were analyzed for the presence of TET2 mut (coding exons 3 to 11), and results were correlated with data from molecular genetic analyses, gene-expression profiling, and clinical outcome. Results: In total, 66 TET2 mut were found in 60 patients (60 of 783 patients; 7.6%), including missense (n = 37), frameshift (n = 16), and nonsense (n = 13) mutations, which, with one exception, were all heterozygous. TET2 mut were not correlated with distinct clinical features or genetic alterations, except for isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations (IDH mut ) that were almost mutually exclusive with TET2 mut (P < .001). TET2 mut were characterized by only a weak gene-expression pattern, which, nevertheless, reflected TET2 mut -associated biology. TET2 mut did not impact the response to induction therapy and clinical outcome; the combination of patients who exhibited TET2 mut and/or IDH mut revealed shorter overall survival (P = .03), although this association was not independent from known risk factors. Conclusion: TET2 mut were identified in 7.6% of younger adult patients with AML and did not impact the response to therapy and survival. Mutations were mutually exclusive with IDH mut , which supported recent data on a common mechanism of action that might obscure the impact of TET2 mut if compared against all other patients with AML.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2011.39.2886

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Up to 90% of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) harbour a point mutation in canonical (HIST1H3B (H3.1)) or variant (H3F3A (H3.3)) histone H3, resulting in a lysine 27 to methionine (K27M) substitution.

    “Of these, up to 90% of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) harbour a point mutation in canonical ( HIST1H3B (H3.1)) or variant ( H3F3A (H3.3)) histone H3, resulting in a lysine 27 to methionine (K27M) substitution 101-103 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaidzik, V. I., Paschka, P., Späth, D., Habdank, M., Köhne, C.-H., Germing, U., von Lilienfeld-Toal, M., Held, G., Horst, H.-A., Haase, D., Bentz, M., Götze, K., Döhner, H., Schlenk, R. F., Bullinger, L., & Döhner, K.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Verena I. Gaidzik, Peter Paschka, Daniela Späth, Marianne Habdank, Hartmut Döhner, Richard F. Schlenk, Lars Bullinger, and Konstanze Döhner, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm; Claus-Henning Köhne, Klinikum Oldenburg, Oldenburg; Ulrich Germing, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn; Gerhard Held, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg; Heinz-August Horst, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel; Detlef Haase, Universitätsklinikum...
Corresponding author
  • Döhner, Hartmut
  • Döhner, Konstanze
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2012-04-20
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
1350-1357
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4238020764
Cited by
185
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BU 1339/3-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
TET2 mutation, acute myeloid leukemia, IDH mutation, mutation frequency, gene expression profiling, clinical outcomes, overall survival, induction therapy response, risk stratification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review