Cited by 626Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer survivorship and careBreast Lesions and Carcinomas

Breast Cancer Follow-Up and Management After Primary Treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update

Khatcheressian, James L., Hurley, Patricia, Bantug, Elissa, Esserman, Laura J., Grunfeld, Eva, Halberg, Francine, Hantel, Alexander, Henry, N. Lynn +6 more·2013·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: To provide recommendations on the follow-up and management of patients with breast cancer who have completed primary therapy with curative intent. Methods: To update the 2006 guideline of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), a systematic review of the literature published from March 2006 through March 2012 was completed using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library. An Update Committee reviewed the evidence to determine whether the recommendations were in need of updating. Results: There were 14 new publications that met inclusion criteria: nine systematic reviews (three included meta-analyses) and five randomized controlled trials. After its review and analysis of the evidence, the Update Committee concluded that no revisions to the existing ASCO recommendations were warranted. Recommendations: Regular history, physical examination, and mammography are recommended for breast cancer follow-up. Physical examinations should be performed every 3 to 6 months for the first 3 years, every 6 to 12 months for years 4 and 5, and annually thereafter. For women who have undergone breast-conserving surgery, a post-treatment mammogram should be obtained 1 year after the initial mammogram and at least 6 months after completion of radiation therapy. Thereafter, unless otherwise indicated, a yearly mammographic evaluation should be performed. The use of complete blood counts, chemistry panels, bone scans, chest radiographs, liver ultrasounds, pelvic ultrasounds, computed tomography scans, [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography scans, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 15-3, and CA 27.29) is not recommended for routine follow-up in an otherwise asymptomatic patient with no specific findings on clinical examination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2012.45.9859

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optimal comprehensive survivorship care delivery needs to go beyond screening of recurrences and new malignancies and include health promotion, identification and management of physical and psychosocial needs, and proper attention to concomitant chronic health conditions.

    “It is now consensual that optimal comprehensive survivorship care delivery needs to go beyond screening of recurrences and new malignancies and include health promotion, identification and management of physical and psychosocial needs, and proper attention to concomitant chronic health conditions.8,10-12”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khatcheressian, J. L., Hurley, P., Bantug, E., Esserman, L. J., Grunfeld, E., Halberg, F., Hantel, A., Henry, N. L., Muss, H. B., Smith, T. J., Vogel, V. G., Wolff, A. C., Somerfield, M. R., & Davidson, N. E.
Affiliations
American Society of Clinical Oncology (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2013-03-01
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
961-965
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2143037181
Cited by
626
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Keywords
breast cancer, post-treatment follow-up, surveillance (medicine), breast-conserving surgery, mammography, physical examination, tumor markers, CA15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 27.29, curative intent
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mammography, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Palpation, Physical Examination, Population Surveillance, Time Factors, United States, Mastectomy, Segmental, Evidence-Based Medicine, Advisory Committees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review