Cited by 249Cancer survivorship and careInterprofessional Education and CollaborationHealthcare Systems and Technology

Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities

Open access
Nekhlyudov, Larissa, O'malley, Denalee M, Hudson, Shawna V·2017·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Since the release of the Institute of Medicine report: From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition, in 2005, there has been a national call in the USA to provide coordinated, comprehensive care for cancer survivors, with an emphasis on the role of primary care. Several models of care have been described, which focus on primary care providers (PCPs) as receiving cancer survivors who are transferred after successful treatment, and who are given specific types of information from oncology-based care (eg, survivorship care plans), and not as active members of the cancer survivorship team. In this Series paper, we assessed survivorship models that have been described in the literature, with a specific focus on strategies that aim to integrate PCPs into the care of cancer survivors across different settings. We offer insights differentiating PCPs' level of expertise in cancer survivorship and how such expertise could be used. We provide recommendations for education, clinical practice, research, and policy initiatives that might advance the integration of PCPs in the care of cancer survivors in diverse clinical settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30570-8

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [31]Sussman J McBride ML Sisler J Integrating primary care and cancer care in survivorship: A collaborative approach ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings 2016
  2. [32]Howell D Hack TF Oliver TK Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence J Cancer Surviv 2012 6 4 359 71 22777364
  3. [38]Viswanathan M Halpern M Swinson Evans T Models of Cancer Survivorship Care Rockville MD 2014 3 24783311
  4. [60]Nelson M Buelt L Patel K Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative The Patient-Centered Medical Home’s Impact on Cost and Quality Annual Review of Evidence 2014–2015 May be accessed at https://www.pcpcc.org

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nekhlyudov, L., O'malley, D. M., & Hudson, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Nekhlyudov, Larissa
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
e30-e38
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2566660488
Cited by
249
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (CDA‐13‐279)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA176545, R01CA176838)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
cancer survivors, primary care providers, survivorship care, care transitions, care coordination, survivorship care plans, models of care, health policy, clinical guidelines
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Survivors, Evidence-Based Medicine, Physicians, Primary Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review