Cited by 324Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Randomized exercise trial of aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors

Open access
Irwin, Melinda L., Cartmel, Brenda, Gross, Cary P., Ercolano, Elizabeth, Li, Fangyong, Yao, Xiaopan, Fiellin, Martha, Capozza, Scott +8 more·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Arthralgia occurs in up to 50% of breast cancer survivors treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and is the most common reason for poor AI adherence. We conducted, in 121 breast cancer survivors receiving an AI and reporting arthralgia, a yearlong randomized trial of the impact of exercise versus usual care on arthralgia severity. Patients and Methods: Eligibility criteria included receiving an AI for at least 6 months, reporting ≥ 3 of 10 for worst joint pain on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and reporting < 90 minutes per week of aerobic exercise and no strength training. Participants were randomly assigned to exercise (150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise and supervised strength training twice per week) or usual care. The BPI, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were completed at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Intervention effects were evaluated using mixed-model repeated measures analysis, with change at 12 months as the primary end point. Results: Over 12 months, women randomly assigned to exercise (n = 61) attended 70% (± standard deviation [SD], 28%) of resistance training sessions and increased their exercise by 159 (± SD, 136) minutes per week. Worst joint pain scores decreased by 1.6 points (29%) at 12 months among women randomly assigned to exercise versus a 0.2-point increase (3%) among those receiving usual care (n = 60; P < .001). Pain severity and interference, as well as DASH and WOMAC pain scores, also decreased significantly at 12 months in women randomly assigned to exercise, compared with increases for those receiving usual care (all P < .001). Conclusion: Exercise led to improvement in AI-induced arthralgia in previously inactive breast cancer survivors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.57.1547

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Promising results from animal studies are emerging for a protective effect of aerobic training on cancer treatment-related changes in cognitive function, but evidence in humans is limited.

    “While promising results from animal studies are emerging for a protective effect of aerobic training on cancer treatment related changes in cognitive function, to date, the evidence in humans is limited(58).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Solway S, et al. Disabilities of the Arm, Should and Hand (DASH): The DASH and QuickDASH Outcome Measure User's Manual (ed 3) Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Institute for Work and Health; 2011. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irwin, M. L., Cartmel, B., Gross, C. P., Ercolano, E., Li, F., Yao, X., Fiellin, M., Capozza, S., Rothbard, M., Zhou, Y., Harrigan, M., Sanft, T., Schmitz, K., Neogi, T., Hershman, D., & Ligibel, J.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Irwin, Melinda L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-04-01
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
1104-1111
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2152427545
Cited by
324
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 14 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Breast Cancer Research Foundation (P30 CA016359)
  • State of Connecticut Department of Public Health
  • Yale University (UL1 TR000142)
  • Yale Cancer Center (P30-CA016359, Support Grant No. P30 CA016359, UL1 TR000142)
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000142, CA016359, TR000142)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA132931, Grant No. R01 CA132931, CA-016359, P30CA016359)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P60AR047785)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia, breast cancer survivors, exercise intervention, aerobic exercise, resistance training, joint pain, pain intensity, exercise adherence, WOMAC, DASH, Brief Pain Inventory, osteoarthritis
MeSH terms
Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Arthralgia, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review