Cited by 150Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

Continuous Therapy Versus Fixed Duration of Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Open access
Palumbo, Antonio, Gay, Francesca, Cavallo, Federica, Di Raimondo, Francesco, Larocca, Alessandra, Hardan, Izhar, Nagler, Arnon, Petrucci, Maria T. +20 more·2015·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: Continuous therapy (CT) prolongs progression-free survival 1 (PFS1; time from random assignment until the first progression or death), but chemotherapy-resistant relapse may negatively impact overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2; time from random assignment until the second progression or death) may represent an additional tool to estimate outcome. This study evaluates the benefit of novel agent–based CT versus fixed duration of therapy (FDT) in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Methods: We included patients enrolled onto three phase III trials that randomly assigned patients to novel agent–based CT versus FDT. Primary analyses were restricted to the intent-to-treat population eligible for CT (patients progression free and alive at 1 year after random assignment). Primary end points were PFS1, PFS2, and OS. All hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were adjusted for several potential confounders using Cox models. Results: In the pooled analysis of the three trials, 604 patients were randomly assigned to CT and 614 were assigned to FDT. Median follow-up was 52 months. In the intent-to-treat CT population, CT (n = 417), compared with FDT (n = 410), significantly improved PFS1 (median, 32 v 16 months, respectively; HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.56; P < .001), PFS2 (median, 55 v 40 months, respectively; HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.75; P < .001), and OS (4-year OS, 69% v 60%, respectively; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.88; P = .003). Conclusion: In this pooled analysis, CT significantly improved PFS1, PFS2, and OS. The improvement in PFS2 suggests that the benefit reported during first remission is not cancelled by a shorter second remission. PFS2 is a valuable end point to estimate long-term clinical benefit and should be included in future trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2014.60.2466

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palumbo, A., Gay, F., Cavallo, F., Di Raimondo, F., Larocca, A., Hardan, I., Nagler, A., Petrucci, M. T., Hajek, R., Pezzatti, S., Delforge, M., Patriarca, F., Donato, F., Cerrato, C., Nozzoli, C., Yu, Z., Boccadifuoco, L., Caravita, T., Benevolo, G., Guglielmelli, T., Vincelli, D., Jacques, C., Dimopoulos, M. A., Ciccone, G., Musto, P., Corradini, P., Cavo, M., & Boccadoro, M.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
  • Antonio Palumbo, Francesca Gay, Federica Cavallo, Alessandra Larocca, Francesca Donato, Chiara Cerrato, Luana Boccadifuoco, and Mario Boccadoro, University of Torino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino; Giulia Benevolo, S.C. Ematologia A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino; Tommasina Guglielmelli, University of Turin and San Luigi Hospital; Giovannino Ciccone, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and CPO...
  • University of Udine (IT)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2015-10-20
Volume
33
Issue
30
Pages
3459-3466
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2107384529
Cited by
150
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 3
FWCI
16.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Celgene
  • Cilag
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
multiple myeloma, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, continuous treatment, progression-free survival, overall survival, second remission, chemoresistance
MeSH terms
Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Melphalan, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Prednisone, Thalidomide, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review