Cited by 244PARP inhibition in cancer therapyPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Overall survival results from the POLO trial: A Phase III study of active maintenance olaparib versus placebo for germline BRCA-mutated metastatic pancreatic cancer

Open access
Kindler, Hedy L., Hammel, Pascal, Reni, Michele, Van Cutsem, Eric, Macarulla, Teresa, Hall, Michael J., Park, Joon Oh, Hochhauser, Daniel +11 more·2022·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The phase III POLO study demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit for active olaparib maintenance therapy versus placebo for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a germline BRCA mutation. Here, we report the final analysis of overall survival (OS) and other secondary end points. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA mutation whose disease had not progressed after ≥ 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 3:2 to active maintenance olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points included OS, time to second disease progression or death, time to first and second subsequent cancer therapies or death, time to discontinuation of study treatment or death, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: In total, 154 patients were randomly assigned (olaparib, n = 92; placebo, n = 62). No statistically significant OS benefit was observed (median 19.0 v 19.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.22; P = .3487). Kaplan-Meier OS curves separated at approximately 24 months, and the estimated 3-year survival after random assignment was 33.9% versus 17.8%, respectively. Median time to first subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66; P < .0001), time to second subsequent cancer therapy or death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.89; P = .0111), and time to discontinuation of study treatment or death (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.63; P < .0001) significantly favored olaparib. The HR for second disease progression or death favored olaparib without reaching statistical significance (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.02; P = .0613). Olaparib was well tolerated with no new safety signals. CONCLUSION: Although no statistically significant OS benefit was observed, the HR numerically favored olaparib, which also conferred clinically meaningful benefits including increased time off chemotherapy and long-term survival in a subset of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.21.01604

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longer follow-up did not show an overall survival improvement for the PARP inhibitor compared with placebo after platinum-based therapy.

    “longer follow up data did not demonstrate a similar improvement in overall survival (OS) compared to patients who received placebo alone following platinum-based therapy88.”

    From Pancreatic cancer: Advances and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kindler, H. L., Hammel, P., Reni, M., Van Cutsem, E., Macarulla, T., Hall, M. J., Park, J. O., Hochhauser, D., Arnold, D., Oh, D.-Y., Reinacher-Schick, A., Tortora, G., Algül, H., O'Reilly, E. M., Bordia, S., McGuinness, D., Cui, K., Locker, G. Y., & Golan, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • University Hospitals Gasthuisberg and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Asklepios Klinik Altona (DE)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • St Josef-Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2022-12-01
Volume
40
Issue
34
Pages
3929-3939
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W4285386328
Cited by
244
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 9
FWCI
19.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • Alnylam Pharmaceuticals
  • Celgene
  • FibroGen
  • Array BioPharma
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • Merck KGaA
  • Taiho Pharmaceutical
  • Exelixis
  • Novocure
  • Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre
  • Halozyme
  • Mylan
  • Constellation Pharmaceuticals
  • BeiGene
  • Incyte
  • MacroGenics
  • Eisai
  • Astellas Pharma
  • European Society for Medical Oncology
  • Servier
  • Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
  • Ipsen
  • Sirtex Medical
  • Aptitude Health
  • National Institutes of Health (CA008748)
  • Genentech
  • EMD Serono
  • Chugai Pharmaceutical
  • National Cancer Institute (CA008748, P30- 17 CA008748, P30CA008748)
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
olaparib, maintenance therapy, germline BRCA mutation, metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, PARP inhibitors, overall survival, progression-free survival, platinum-based chemotherapy, secondary malignancies, PARP inhibitor resistance, treatment discontinuation, safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Female, Germ Cells, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Phthalazines, Piperazines, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review