Cited by 39Electronic Health Records SystemsCancer survivorship and careNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Implementation and Feasibility of an Electronic Health Record–Integrated Patient-Reported Outcomes Symptom and Needs Monitoring Pilot in Ambulatory Oncology

Open access
Penedo, Frank J., Medina, Heidy N., Moreno, Patricia I., Sookdeo, Vandana, Natori, Akina, Boland, Cody, Schlumbrecht, Matthew P., Calfa, Carmen +3 more·2022·JCO Oncology Practice

Abstract

PURPOSE: Describe the feasibility and implementation of an electronic health record (EHR)–integrated symptom and needs screening and referral system in a diverse racial/ethnic patient population in ambulatory oncology. METHODS: Data were collected from an ambulatory oncology clinic at the University of Miami Health System from October 2019 to January 2021. Guided by a Patient Advisory Board and the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment model, My Wellness Check was developed to assess physical and psychologic symptoms and needs of ambulatory oncology patients before appointments to triage them to supportive services when elevated symptoms (eg, depression), barriers to care (eg, transportation and childcare), and nutritional needs were identified. Patients were assigned assessments at each appointment no more than once in a 30-day period starting at the second visit. Assessments were available in English and Spanish to serve the needs of the predominantly Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latino population. RESULTS: From 1,232 assigned assessments, more than half (n = 739 assessments; 60.0%) were initiated by 506 unique patients. A total of 65.4% of English and 49.9% of Spanish assessments were initiated. Among all initiated assessments, the majority (85.1%) were completed at home via the patient portal. The most common endorsed items were nutritional needs (32.9%), followed by emotional symptoms (ie, depression and anxiety; 27.8%), practical needs (eg, financial concerns; 21.7%), and physical symptoms (17.6%). Across the physical symptom, social work, and nutrition-related alerts, 77.1%, 99.7%, and 78.8%, were addressed, respectively, by the corresponding oncology health professional, social work team member, or nutritionist. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate encouraging feasibility and initial acceptability of implementing an EHR-integrated symptom and needs screening and referral system among diverse oncology patients. To our knowledge, this is the first EHR-integrated symptom and needs screening system implemented in routine oncology care for Spanish-speaking Hispanics/Latinos.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/op.21.00706

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [58]Wu AW Jensen RE Salzburg C: Advances in the Use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Electronic Health Records: Including Case Studies Landscape Review Prepared for the PCORI National Workshop to Advance the Use of PRO Measures in Electronic Health Records. Atlanta, GA, 2013. http://www.pcori.org/assets/2013/11/PCORI-PRO-Workshop-EHR-Landscape-Review-111913.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penedo, F. J., Medina, H. N., Moreno, P. I., Sookdeo, V., Natori, A., Boland, C., Schlumbrecht, M. P., Calfa, C., MacIntyre, J., Crane, T. E., & Garcia, S. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Penedo, Frank J.
Venue
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2022-07
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
e1100-e1113
ISSN
  • 2688-1527 (ISSN-L)
  • 2688-1535
OpenAlex
W4220748522
Cited by
39
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JCO Oncology Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS026170, R18HS026170-01)
  • National Cancer Institute (K01CA258955, P30CA240139)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
electronic health record integration, patient-reported outcomes, symptom screening, needs assessment, outpatient oncology, supportive care, patient portals, Spanish-speaking patients, Hispanic patients, anxiety and depression, nutrient requirements, social work referral, barriers to care, implementation feasibility
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review