The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis
Abstract
Broadening its scope to nonstatisticians, Bayesian Methods for Data Analysis, Third Edition provides an accessible introduction to the foundations and applications of Bayesian analysis. Along with a complete reorganization of the material, this edition concentrates more on hierarchical Bayesian modeling as implemented via Markov chain Monte Carlo (
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions
Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., & Best, N. (2009) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3680 · Cited by 1,876
Bayesian estimation supersedes the t-test
Kruschke, J. K. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0029146 · Cited by 1,530
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4 · Cited by 1,288
Rejecting or Accepting Parameter Values in Bayesian Estimation
Kruschke, J. K. (2018) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918771304 · Cited by 734
Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS
Barry, J. (2011) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v7i4.163 · Cited by 563
Improving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist.
Depaoli, S., & van de Schoot, R. (2017) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000065 · Cited by 448
Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars
Mayo, D. G. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781107286184 · Cited by 376
What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis
Kruschke, J. K. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.001 · Cited by 342
Stress reduces conception probabilities across the fertile window: evidence in support of relaxation
Buck Louis, G. M., Lum, K. J., Sundaram, R., Chen, Z., Kim, S., Lynch, C. D., Schisterman, E. F., & Pyper, C. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.078 · Cited by 189
Independent contrasts and PGLS regression estimators are equivalent
Blomberg, S. P., Lefevre, J. G., Wells, J. A., & Waterhouse, M. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr118 · Cited by 158
The Depression Treatment Cascade in Primary Care: A Public Health Perspective
Pence, B. W., O’Donnell, J. K., & Gaynes, B. N. (2012) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-012-0274-y · Cited by 133
Praet, J., Manyakov, N. V., Muchene, L., Mai, Z., Terzopoulos, V., de Backer, S., Torremans, A., Guns, P.-J., Van De Casteele, T., Bottelbergs, A., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-017-0329-8 · Cited by 133
Improved precision on the radius of the nearby super-Earth 55 Cnc e
Gillon, M., Demory, B.-O., Benneke, B., Valencia, D., Deming, D., Seager, S., Lovis, C., Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al. (2012) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118309 · Cited by 107
Integrating Probability and Nonprobability Samples for Survey Inference
Wiśniowski, A., Sakshaug, J. W., Perez Ruiz, D. A., & Blom, A. G. (2020) · Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology · doi:10.1093/jssam/smz051 · Cited by 102
Wheeler, D. C., Hickson, D. A., & Waller, L. A. (2010) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2010.01.025 · Cited by 90
The effect of landscape position on biomass crop yield
Thelemann, R., Johnson, G., Sheaffer, C., Banerjee, S., Cai, H., & Wyse, D. (2010) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0058 · Cited by 56
Ozechowski, T. J. (2014) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035889 · Cited by 42
Automatic Crack Classification by Exploiting Statistical Event Descriptors for Deep Learning
Siracusano, G., Garescì, F., Finocchio, G., Tomasello, R., Lamonaca, F., Scuro, C., Carpentieri, M., Chiappini, M., & La Corte, A. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112412059 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlin, B. P., & Louis, T. A.
- Venue
- Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks
- Publisher
- Chapman and Hall/CRC
- Published
- 2008-06-30
- OpenAlex
- W1566333899
- Cited by
- 917
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
