Effect of Maternal Smoking on Fetal Catecholamine Concentrations at Birth
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare catecholamine concentrations in the fetal umbilical artery cord blood from the offspring of smokers versus the offspring of nonsmokers. Pregnant women who were self-identified as smokers (>/=10 cigarettes per day throughout pregnancy) or nonsmokers were recruited for study participation. Maternal blood was collected for cotinine concentrations. Umbilical artery cord blood was collected at delivery for arterial pH and catecholamine concentrations. Cord blood was obtained from 51 subjects, including 21 smokers and 30 nonsmokers. Median epinephrine concentrations [304 pg/mL versus 597 pg/mL (Mann-Whitney U = 170; p = 0.006)] and median norepinephrine concentrations [3148 pg/mL versus 6558 pg/mL (Mann-Whitney U = 191; p = 0.006)] were significantly lower in smokers compared with nonsmokers, respectively. After controlling for gestational age, route of delivery, and arterial pH, log-transformed epinephrine concentrations between smokers and nonsmokers were statistically significant (p = 0.03), with a similar trend for log-transformed norepinephrine concentrations (p = 0.07). Analyses of the data using cotinine <20 ng/mL to classify nonsmokers also showed differences in epinephrine concentrations between groups (p = 0.02). These results are consistent with results from animal studies showing that catecholamine concentrations may be affected by prenatal nicotine exposure. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to examine the specific mechanism by which these differences may arise.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The same adrenomedullary deficiency in response to hypoxia has been found in newborns of smokers.
“the same deficiency in adrenomedullary function in response to hypoxia has been identified in the offspring of smokers at birth.”
From Developmental toxicity of nicotine: A transdisciplinary synthesis and implications for emerging tobacco products (2017) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Lagercrantz, H., & Slotkin, T. A. (1986) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0486-100 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Slotkin, T. A. (2008) · Neurotoxicology and Teratology · doi:10.1016/j.ntt.2007.09.002 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Self-citationEngland, L. J., Aagaard, K., Bloch, M., Conway, K., Cosgrove, K., Grana, R., Gould, T. J., Hatsukami, D., Jensen, F., Kandel, D., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.013 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationJacobsen, L. K., Picciotto, M. R., Heath, C. J., Frost, S. J., Tsou, K. A., Dwan, R. A., Jackowski, M. P., Constable, R. T., & Mencl, W. E. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2402-07.2007 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Fetal behavior in smoking compared to non-smoking pregnant women
Cowperthwaite, B., Hains, S. M. J., & Kisilevsky, B. S. (2007) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.12.004 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oncken, C. A., Henry, K. M., Campbell, W. A., Kuhn, C. M., Slotkin, T. A., & Kranzler, H. R.
- Affiliations
- UConn Health (US)
- Hartford Hospital (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Oncken, Cheryl A
- Venue
- Pediatric Research
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-124
- ISSN
- 0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-0447
- OpenAlex
- W2018782087
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01da014247-03)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA00239, AA-03510)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA015167, DA 13334, DA14247, DA15167, P50DA013334)
- National Cancer Institute (CA89053, R01CA089053)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR-06192, M01RR006192)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Keywords
- maternal smoking, prenatal nicotine exposure, umbilical cord blood, epinephrine, norepinephrine, cotinine, fetal hypoxia, arterial pH, pregnancy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Gas Analysis, Catecholamines, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Smoking, Maternal Exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review