Cited by 345Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentSchool Choice and PerformanceInfant Development and Preterm Care

Persistent Effects of Early Childhood Education on High-Risk Children and Their Mothers

Ramey, Craig T., Campbell, Frances A., Burchinal, Margaret, Skinner, Martie L., Gardner, David M., Ramey, Sharon L.·2000·Applied Developmental Science

Abstract

Child and mother outcomes are reported for the Abecedarian Project, an early childhood education, pediatric healthcare, and family support program for high-risk children and their mothers. Three randomized intervention conditions for at-risk participants were compared to a control condition. Randomized control group participants received family support social services, low-cost or free pediatric care, and child nutritional supplements but no additional educational program beyond what the parents and the local school system provided. The local community was generally affluent and well educated; disadvantaged families represented a small minority whose welfare was a high social and educational priority. The educational intervention conditions were (a) preschool education for the first 5 years of life plus a supplementary kindergarten through 2nd grade Educational Support Program (Preschool plus K-2 Support), (b) preschool education (Preschool Only), and (c) K-2 Educational Support Program (K-2 Only). Child outcomes were assessed with respect to cognitive development, academic achievement, grade retention, and special education placements. For mothers, the effect of having educational childcare during the preschool period was examined with respect to maternal educational gains and employment. Positive and systematic cognitive and academic achievement differences were found for children in the preschool treatment conditions, particularly when that condition was combined with the K-2 Educational Support Program. High-quality, consistently available preschool education was also associated with greater maternal educational advancement and higher levels of employment particularly for teenage mothers. These findings have direct relevance for education and welfare policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532480xads0401_1

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the Carolina Abecedarian Project, healthy infants at risk of academic difficulties were randomly assigned to the project or a control intervention.

    “In 1972, healthy infants at risk of academic difficulties because of their demographic circumstances (eg, poor, minority, single parents) were randomly assigned to the Carolina Abecedarian Project or a control intervention”

    From Education improves public health and promotes health equity (2015) · cites this paper as [40]

  • In the Carolina Abecedarian Project, both the preschool and the early schooling programs were beneficial in terms of academic achievement, with the preschool program having the larger effect.

    “At follow-up, both the preschool and the early schooling programs were shown to be beneficial in terms of academic achievement; the preschool program had the larger effect.”

    From Education improves public health and promotes health equity (2015) · cites this paper as [40]

  • In the Abecedarian Project, before entering kindergarten, control and experimental children were again randomized into either routine schooling or a strengthened school program complemented by home visits.

    “Before entering kindergarten, control and experimental children were again randomized into either routine schooling or a strengthened school program complemented by home visits for parental guidance to reinforce child learning.”

    From Education improves public health and promotes health equity (2015) · cites this paper as [40]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramey, C. T., Campbell, F. A., Burchinal, M., Skinner, M. L., Gardner, D. M., & Ramey, S. L.
Venue
Applied Developmental Science
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
2-14
ISSN
  • 1088-8691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-480X
OpenAlex
W1988834652
Cited by
345
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
49.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
Abecedarian Project, early childhood education, preschool education, vulnerable children, maternal education, maternal employment, cognitive development, academic performance, school retention, special education placement, educational support programs, family support services, pediatric health care, adolescent mothers, welfare policy, long-term intervention effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review