Cited by 128Cognitive Abilities and TestingEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

The environment in raising early intelligence: A meta-analysis of the fadeout effect

Protzko, John·2015·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2015.10.006

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. *Karnes, 1974, The Karnes' preschool program: Rationale, curricula offerings and follow-up data, Vol. 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Protzko, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Protzko, John
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
53
Pages
202-210
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2196005169
Cited by
128
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
IQ, early childhood intervention, intervention sustainability, catching up, child development, growth curve models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review