The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing and Structuring Attitudes Toward the Use of Gene Technology in Food Production: The Role of Perceived Ethical Obligation
Abstract
Public attitudes toward applications of gene technology are believed to be a major factor influencing the extent of the future development of the technology. Although survey research has shown that people often profess little knowledge about the technology, they nevertheless frequently indicate considerable concern about it. Ethical issues feature strongly both in the literature and in public opinion. In a study (N = 334) of attitudes toward the use of the technology in food production using the basic structure of the theory of reasoned action (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980) but incorporating additional model components compatible with recent theorizing, it was found that there is a strong predictive link between behavioral beliefs/outcome evaluations, attitudes, and expectations for two behavioral themes linked to the technology. Measures of perceived ethical obligation produced only a marginally significant independent contribution to the prediction of expectations; however, they did provide a significant contribution to the prediction of attitudes. Perceived behavioral control provided an independent contribution in one analysis, as did a measure of self-identity. The findings are discussed in relation to the role of moral/ethical concerns in the structure of the theory, to the relationship between predictors of intentions/expectations, and to the sufficiency of the expected-utility basis of attitudes that the theory promotes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-h · Cited by 1,325
Gene technology, food production, and public opinion: a UK study
Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. J. (1994) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/bf01534445 · Cited by 142
Self-citation
Cited by
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research
Conner, M., & Armitage, C. J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x · Cited by 3,344
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · Cited by 1,765
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00619.x · Cited by 989
An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption
Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9 · Cited by 891
Metadata
- Authors
- Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. J.
- Venue
- Basic and Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-285
- ISSN
- 0197-3533 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4834
- OpenAlex
- W1975144217
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.