Cited by 156Social and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyAcademic Freedom and Politics

Relations among political attitudes, personality, and psychopathology assessed with new measures of Libertarianism and Conservatism

Mehrabian, Albert·1996·Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

The relation between new Libertarianism-Totalitarianism and Conservatism-Liberalism scales was explored in four studies. The Libertarianism and Conservatism scales were free of social desirability bias. Results consistently showed that conservatives were more libertarian (or less totalitarian) than moderates and liberals, with the latter two groups not differing significantly. Political orientations were also explored in relation to three general systems of personality description: the Big Five personality factors, the nurturance and dominance factors of the Circumplex, and the Pleasure-Arousability-Dominance (PAD) Temperament Model. Across four studies, the Libertarianism and Conservatism scales were consistently and strikingly unrelated to personality and temperament factors; nor were they related to measures of psychological adjustment-maladjustment (depression, trait anxiety, panic, somatization) or to measures of substance abuse (alcohol use and ding use).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15324834basp1804_7

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037//1040-3590.4.1.26 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037//0022-3514.38.3.492 · DOI
  3. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. &Lusbene, R. E. (1970). Manualfor the state-traitanxiety inventory.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  4. Wilson, G. U. (1973). The psychology of conservatism.New York: Academic Press.
  5. Wylie, R. (1961). The selfconcept.New York: Wiley.
  6. Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology ofpersonality.New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehrabian, A.
Corresponding author
Mehrabian, Albert
Venue
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
Published
1996-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
469-491
ISSN
  • 0197-3533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4834
OpenAlex
W2046628316
Cited by
156
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Basic and Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
Keywords
political attitudes, libertarianism, conservatism, totalitarianism, political orientation, Big Five personality traits, circumplex model, temperament, psychopathology, depression, trait anxiety, panic, somatization, substance abuse, alcohol consumption, drug use, social desirability bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review