Cited by 357Mathematics Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Learning Mathematics From Examples and by Doing

Open access
Zhu, Xinming, Simon, Herbert A.·1987·Cognition and Instruction

Abstract

This article demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of teaching several mathematical skills by presenting students with carefully chosen sequences of worked-out examples and problems - without lectures or other direct instruction. Thinking-aloud protocols of 20 students learning factorization by this method are analyzed to determine the kinds and depth of understanding students attained. Students did not simply memorize procedures but were able to recognize when the procedures were applicable and to apply them. Most students were also able to use their understanding of the concept of factorization to help learn the procedures and to check their results. The method of learning from examples has now been tested successfully with a class covering the entire 3-year curriculum in algebra and geometry in a Chinese middle school.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532690xci0403_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhu and Simon (1987) demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of teaching Chinese middle school students' mathematical skills through selected sequences of worked examples.

    “Zhu and Simon (1987) demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of teaching Chinese middle school students' mathematical skills through selected sequences of worked examples.”

    From Worked Example Mid-Semester Intervention in College Algebra (2022) · cites this paper as Zhu and Simon (1987)

  • Zhu and Simon (1987) found that students retained the material at a very high level and experimental groups retained material at a slightly higher percentage than the control group taught by traditional lecture.

    “When the students were retested after a year or two had passed, Zhu and Simon (1987) found that students retained the material at a very high level and the experimental groups retained material at a slightly higher percentage than the control group that was taught by traditional lecture.”

    From Worked Example Mid-Semester Intervention in College Algebra (2022) · cites this paper as Zhu and Simon (1987)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, X., & Simon, H. A.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Cognition and Instruction
Published
1987-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
137-166
ISSN
  • 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-690X
OpenAlex
W2028487549
Cited by
357
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
learning from examples, worked examples, mathematics learning, factorization, algebra instruction, problem solving, think-aloud, conceptual understanding, junior high school mathematics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review