The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Executive Functioning as a Predictor of Children's Mathematics Ability: Inhibition, Switching, and Working Memory
Abstract
Children's mathematical skills were considered in relation to executive functions. Using multiple measures--including the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task (WCST), dual-task performance, Stroop task, and counting span-it was found that mathematical ability was significantly correlated with all measures of executive functioning, with the exception of dual-task performance. Furthermore, regression analyses revealed that each executive function measure predicted unique variance in mathematics ability. These results are discussed in terms of a central executive with diverse functions (Shallice & Burgess, 1996) and with recent evidence from Miyake, et al. (2000) showing the unity and diversity among executive functions. It is proposed that the particular difficulties for children of lower mathematical ability are lack of inhibition and poor working memory, which result in problems with switching and evaluation of new strategies for dealing with a particular task. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed, along with suggestions for task changes and longitudinal studies that would clarify theoretical and developmental issues related to executive functioning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An early demonstration of this relation was seen in a correlational study in which measures of working memory and the flexible shifting of attention were shown to independently predict early mathematics achievement over and above measures of reading ability and IQ”
From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Bull & Scerif 2001
In the citing paper
“Children Õ s abilities to store and manipulate information in short-term memory are closely associated with scholastic attainments over the school years.”
From A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in young children (2004) · cites this paper as Bull & Scerif, 2001
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory
(2010) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-62209-1 · Cited by 6,035
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 · Cited by 5,500
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
Specific impairments of planning
Shallice, T. (1982) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1982.0082 · Cited by 3,741
Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60041-9 · Cited by 3,456
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual – Revised and Expanded
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, C., Talley, J., Kay, G., & Curtiss, G. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,975
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Elliott, C. D., Murray, D. J. & Pearson, L. S. (1979). British Ability Scales. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.
- 10.1037//0022-0663.92.2.377 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-2909.109.2.163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0096-1523.25.1.39 · DOI
- Phillips, L. (1997). Do "frontal tests"measure executive function? Issues of assessment and evidence from fluency tests. In P. M. A. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of Frontal and Executive Functions (pp. 191-214). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x · Cited by 3,140
“…a study examining mathematics ability in children in the first grade, at age 7 years, independent effects were reported for inhibitory control, attention shifting , and working memory aspects of executive function, with the most robust relation being that for working memory (Bull & Scerif, 2001).”
BackgroundPreschool Program Improves Cognitive Control
Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1151148 · Cited by 2,025
Meta-Analysis of Neurobehavioral Outcomes in Very Preterm and/or Very Low Birth Weight Children
Aarnoudse-Moens, C. S. H., Weisglas-Kuperus, N., van Goudoever, J. B., & Oosterlaan, J. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2816 · Cited by 1,587
Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640801982312 · Cited by 1,544
“…executive functioning and children’s early emerging and developing mathematical skills across a wide age range (e.g., Bull, Johnston, & Roy, 1999; Bull & Scerif, 2001; Espy, McDiarmid, Cwik, Stalets, Hamby, & Senn, 2004; Gathercole & Pickering, 2000; Gathercole et al., 2004; McLean & Hitch,…”
InfluentialSelf-citationLinks between behavioral regulation and preschoolers’ literacy, vocabulary, and math skills.
McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.947 · Cited by 1,561
“…attention, working memory, and inhibitory control are each important for school performance and adaptation (Alexander et al., 1993; Blair, 2002; Bull & Scerif, 2001; McClelland et al., 2006; National Institute of Child Health & Human Development [NICHD] Early Child Care Research Network, 2003).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bull, R., & Scerif, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Venue
- Developmental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-293
- ISSN
- 1532-6942 (ISSN-L)
- 8756-5641
- OpenAlex
- W2142887785
- Semantic Scholar
- 813c3c045849f82cac2db2f26cee0ca306349f28
- Cited by
- 1,501
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Nuffield Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- executive function, mathematical ability, children, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, working memory, central executive, dual-task performance, Stroop task, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, strategy evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Mathematics, Memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
