The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain
Abstract
In this work, we examined the surprising value consumers attach to getting a bargain. Past research has largely understood this phenomenon in terms of the impact discounts have on perceptions of fairness. However, the evidence for this explanation is inconclusive due to a number of viable alternatives as well as issues relating to construct and external validity. The experiments we report here provide clearer evidence for the basic assertion that discounts increase purchase satisfaction due to the nonfinancial rewards that are associated with perceptions of fairness. Furthermore, current notions of fairness in the promotion literature are extended by showing that social cues such as the relative size of the discount received by another customer and the loyalty status of that customer can also have an important impact on fairness and purchase satisfaction. We suggest an integration of transaction utility theory (Thaler, 1985) and equity theory (Bagozzi, 1975) to account for these findin
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.4.341 · Cited by 6,544
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300202 · Cited by 2,084
Bagozzi, R. P. (1975) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1250593 · Cited by 1,648
Cited by
The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions
Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733 · Cited by 1,474
Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions
Haws, K. L., & Bearden, W. O. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/508435 · Cited by 520
How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture?
Bolton, L. E., Keh, H. T., & Alba, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.3.564 · Cited by 264
Lee, J. E., & Chen-Yu, J. H. (2018) · Fashion and Textiles · doi:10.1186/s40691-018-0128-2 · Cited by 148
Effects of price framing on consumers’ perceptions of online dynamic pricing practices
Weisstein, F. L., Monroe, K. B., & Kukar-Kinney, M. (2013) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-013-0330-0 · Cited by 146
Consumer response to norm-breaking pricing events in e-commerce
Garbarino, E., & Maxwell, S. (2010) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.12.010 · Cited by 126
Personalized pricing and price fairness
Richards, T. J., Liaukonyte, J., & Streletskaya, N. A. (2016) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.11.004 · Cited by 99
Seeking the perfect price: Consumer responses to personalized price discrimination in e-commerce
Hufnagel, G., Schwaiger, M., & Weritz, L. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.002 · Cited by 78
Consumer Attitudes and Preferences toward Cross-Cultural Ready-To-Eat (RTE) Food
Thienhirun, S., & Chung, S. (2018) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2016.1266544 · Cited by 45
G., R., & Asokan-Ajitha, A. (2021) · Journal of Indian Business Research · doi:10.1108/jibr-04-2018-0132 · Cited by 30
van Boom, W. H., van der Rest, J.-P. I., van den Bos, K., & Dechesne, M. (2020) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-020-00348-7 · Cited by 28
“…is that while in markets with a discriminatory or personalized pricing regime purchase intentions are impacted by perceptions of price fairness (Darke & Dahl, 2003; Maxwell & Garbarino, 2010; Richards, Liaukonyte, & Streletskaya, 2016; Riquelme, Román, Cuestas, & Iacobucci, 2019); the…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Darke, P. R., & Dahl, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 328-338
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W2063414602
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.