Cited by 689Science Education and PedagogyProblem and Project Based LearningEvolution and Science Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inquiry in project‐based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students

Abstract

Although inquiry is an essential component of science learning, we know little about students' experience with inquiry in regular science classrooms. Our goal is to describe realistically what middle school students do and where they have difficulties in their first encounters with inquiry learning. We report findings from case studies of 8 students as they designed and carried out their own investigations during 2 projects that spanned several months. We detail how students asked questions, planned and designed investigations and procedures, constructed apparatus, carried out their work, interpreted data and drew conclusions, and presented the findings. We discuss how collaboration among group members and support from the teacher influenced this process. The findings indicate that middle school students were thoughtful in designing investigations and in planning procedures; for instance, they thought about controls, about samples, and about how to organize data collection. However, the cases also reveal areas of weakness, such as failures to focus on the scientific merit of questions generated and to systematically collect and analyze data and draw conclusions. Teacher structuring and questioning were crucial in encouraging students to be thoughtful about the substantive aspects of inquiry. Overall, these findings can help curriculum developers and science educators in their attempts to design instruction to improve the inquiry process. (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327809jls0703&4_3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The main goal of science education is to introduce students to the culture of science as a means to explore and begin to understand the world, including an appreciation for how scientific knowledge is constructed.

    “The main goal of science education has been identified as introducing students to the culture of science as a means to explore and begin to understand the world around them, including an appreciation for how scientific knowledge is constructed (e.g., Bybee, 1997;Goodrum, 1987;Krajcik et al., 1998;Matthews, 1994;Tobin, Treagust, & Frasier, 1988).”

    From Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation (2007) · cites this paper as Krajcik et al., 1998

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, K., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Published
1998-07-01
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
313-350
ISSN
1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039394652
Cited by
689
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 37
FWCI
55.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, junior high school science, student inquiry, data collection and analysis, collaboration, teacher questioning, science education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review