The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inquiry in project‐based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students
Abstract
Although inquiry is an essential component of science learning, we know little about students' experience with inquiry in regular science classrooms. Our goal is to describe realistically what middle school students do and where they have difficulties in their first encounters with inquiry learning. We report findings from case studies of 8 students as they designed and carried out their own investigations during 2 projects that spanned several months. We detail how students asked questions, planned and designed investigations and procedures, constructed apparatus, carried out their work, interpreted data and drew conclusions, and presented the findings. We discuss how collaboration among group members and support from the teacher influenced this process. The findings indicate that middle school students were thoughtful in designing investigations and in planning procedures; for instance, they thought about controls, about samples, and about how to organize data collection. However, the cases also reveal areas of weakness, such as failures to focus on the scientific merit of questions generated and to systematically collect and analyze data and draw conclusions. Teacher structuring and questioning were crucial in encouraging students to be thoughtful about the substantive aspects of inquiry. Overall, these findings can help curriculum developers and science educators in their attempts to design instruction to improve the inquiry process. (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The main goal of science education is to introduce students to the culture of science as a means to explore and begin to understand the world, including an appreciation for how scientific knowledge is constructed.
“The main goal of science education has been identified as introducing students to the culture of science as a means to explore and begin to understand the world around them, including an appreciation for how scientific knowledge is constructed (e.g., Bybee, 1997;Goodrum, 1987;Krajcik et al., 1998;Matthews, 1994;Tobin, Treagust, & Frasier, 1988).”
From Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation (2007) · cites this paper as Krajcik et al., 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation
Luehmann, A. L. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20209 · Cited by 428
Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay‐Chambers, J. (2008) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20248 · Cited by 423
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R., Bass, K., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-350
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2039394652
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 55.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Keywords
- inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, junior high school science, student inquiry, data collection and analysis, collaboration, teacher questioning, science education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review