The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age
Abstract
This article explores perceptions of news credibility for television, newspapers, and online news. A survey was administered to a randomly selected sample of residents in Austin, Texas, to assess people's attitudes toward these 3 media channels. Contingent factors that might influence news credibility perceptions, such as media use and interpersonal discussion of news, were incorporated into the analysis. Findings suggest that people are generally skeptical of news emanating from all 3 media channels but do rate newspapers with the highest credibility, followed by online news and television news, respectively. Furthermore, opinions about news credibility seem to be correlated across media outlets. The data also show a moderate negative linkage between interpersonal discussion of news and perceptions of media credibility for television news but not for newspapers. When controlling for basic demographics, a positive correlation was found between interpersonal communication and online news credibility. Finally, a marginal association was noted between media use and public perceptions of credibility across all 3 media channels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543
Multiple Comparison Procedures
Hochberg, Y., & Tamhane, A. C. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316672 · Cited by 2,389
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Abel J. D., 1977, Journalism Quarterly, 54, 371, 10.1177/107769907705400223 · DOI
- Addington D. W., 1971, Speech Monographs, 38, 242, 10.1080/03637757109375716 · DOI
- Andsager J. L., 1990, Journalism Quarterly, 67, 485, 10.1177/107769909006700302 · DOI
- 10.1086/267745 · DOI · Paper page
- Burgoon J. K., 1976, Central States Speech Journal, 2, 200, 10.1080/10510977609367893 · DOI
- Carter R., 1965, Journalism Quarterly, 42, 29, 10.1177/107769906504200104 · DOI
- Chaffee, S. H. (1972). The interpersonal context of mass communication. In F. G. Kline & P. J. Tichenor (Eds.), Current perspectives in mass communication research (pp. 95-120). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Chaffee, S. H. (1982). Mass media and interpersonal channels: Competitive, convergent, or complementary? In G. Gumpert & R. Cathcart (Eds.), Inter/media: Interpersonal communication in a media world (pp. 62-80). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Chartprasert D., 1993, Journalism Quarterly, 70, 150, 10.1177/107769909307000117 · DOI
- Cobbey R., 1980, ANPA News Research Reports, 29, 8
- Edelstein A. S., 1974, Communication Research, 1, 426, 10.1177/009365027400100406 · DOI
- Falcione R. L., 1974, Central States Speech Journal, 25, 63, 10.1080/10510977409367770 · DOI
- Flanagin A. J., 2000, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 515, 10.1177/107769900007700304 · DOI · Paper page
- Fredin E. S., 1997, Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs, 163, 1
- Gantz W., 1981, Journal of Broadcasting, 25, 155, 10.1080/08838158109386439 · DOI
- Gaziano C., 1986, Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451, 10.1177/107769908606300301 · DOI
- Greenberg B., 1966, Journalism Quarterly, 43, 665, 10.1177/107769906604300405 · DOI
- 10.1086/269308 · DOI · Paper page
- Himmelweit H., 1976, Journal of Social Issues, 32, 133, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02511.x · DOI
- Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L. & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A. & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication: Studies in social psychology in World War II. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Infante D. A., 1980, Communication Quarterly, 28, 19, 10.1080/01463378009369363 · DOI
- Infante D. A., 1983, Communication Quarterly, 31, 43, 10.1080/01463378309369484 · DOI
- Jacobson H. K., 1969, Journalism Quarterly, 46, 20, 10.1177/107769906904600103 · DOI
- Johnson T. J., 1998, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325, 10.1177/107769909807500208 · DOI · Paper page
- Kelman H. C., 1953, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 327, 10.1037/h0061861 · DOI · Paper page
- Lashbrook W. B., 1977, Communication Monographs, 44, 252, 10.1080/03637757709390136 · DOI
- Lemert J. B., 1970, Journalism Quarterly, 47, 272, 10.1177/107769907004700207 · DOI
- Luchok J. A., 1978, Southern Speech Communication Journal, 43, 371, 10.1080/10417947809372393 · DOI
- Lull, J. (1990). Inside family viewing: Ethnographic research on television's audiences. New York: Routledge.
- Major A. M., 1997, Journalism Quarterly, 74, 797, 10.1177/107769909707400409 · DOI
- Markham D., 1968, Journal of Communication, 18, 57, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1968.tb00055.x · DOI
- McCroskey J. C., 1966, Speech Monographs, 33, 65, 10.1080/03637756609375482 · DOI
- McCroskey J. C., 1974, Speech Teacher, 23, 26, 10.1080/03634527409378053 · DOI
- 10.1086/267647 · DOI
- McQuail, D., Blumler, J. G. & Brown, J. R. (1972). The television audience: A revised perspective. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociology of mass communications (pp. 135-165). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
- Meyer P., 1988, Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567, 10.1177/107769908806500301 · DOI
- Mulac A., 1975, Speech Monographs, 42, 302, 10.1080/03637757509375906 · DOI
- Mulder R., 1981, Journalism Quarterly, 58, 635, 10.1177/107769908105800420 · DOI
- Newhagen J., 1989, Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567
- Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
- Pew Research Center. (1996). One-in-ten voters online for campaign '96 [Online].Retrieved May 1, 1998 from the World Wide Web: http://www.people- press.org/tec96-1.htm
- Pfau M., 1991, Communication Studies, 42, 114, 10.1080/10510979109368327 · DOI
- Rimmer T., 1987, Journalism Quarterly, 64, 28, 10.1177/107769908706400104 · DOI
- Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
- Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communications of innovations. New York: Free Press.
- Shaw E., 1973, Journalism Quarterly, 50, 306, 10.1177/107769907305000213 · DOI
- Singletary M. W., 1976, Journalism Quarterly, 53, 316, 10.1177/107769907605300219 · DOI
- Slater M. D., 1996, Journalism Quarterly, 73, 974, 10.1177/107769909607300415 · DOI · Paper page
- Sundar S. S., 1998, Journalism Quarterly, 75, 55, 10.1177/107769909807500108 · DOI
- Tankard, J. W., Jr. & Ban, H. (1998, August). Online newspapers: Living up to their potential? Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication annual conference, Baltimore, MD.
- Thorson, E. & Moore, J. (1996). The circle of synergy: Theoretical perspectives and an evolving IMC agenda. In E. Thorson & J. Moore (Eds.), Integrated communication: Synergy of persuasive voices (pp. 333-354). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Wanta W., 1994, Journalism Quarterly, 71, 90, 10.1177/107769909407100109 · DOI
- West M. D., 1994, Journalism Quarterly, 71, 159, 10.1177/107769909407100115 · DOI
- Westley B. H., 1964, Journalism Quarterly, 41, 325, 10.1177/107769906404100301 · DOI
- Whitehead J. L., 1968, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54, 59, 10.1080/00335636809382870 · DOI · Paper page
- Yoon K., 1998, Mass Communication and Society, 1, 153, 10.1080/15205436.1998.9677854 · DOI
Cited by
Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework
Rieh, S. Y., & Danielson, D. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114 · Cited by 336
Online News Exposure and Trust in the Mainstream Media: Exploring Possible Associations
Tsfati, Y. (2010) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764210376309 · Cited by 258
Why They Don’t Trust the Media: An Examination of Factors Predicting Trust
Lee, T.-T. (2010) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764210376308 · Cited by 243
Hou, J., & Shim, M. (2010) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.522691 · Cited by 228
Factors Influencing Information credibility on Social Media Platforms: Evidence from Facebook Pages
Li, R., & Suh, A. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.146 · Cited by 225
“Prior studies commonly argue that when individual users rely more on a specific medium for information, they consider it to be more credible than other media [25, 26, 27].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiousis, S.
- Venue
- Mass Communication and Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-403
- ISSN
- 1520-5436 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7825
- OpenAlex
- W2073375484
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327825mcs0404_4
- The paper
- Kiousis, S. (2001). Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age. Mass Communication and Society. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0404_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.