The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes
Abstract
In line with our subjective essentialist view of stereotypes (Yzerbyt, Rocher, & Schadron, 1997), we propose that two classes of factors that mutually reinforce each other influence the perception of groups. The perception of a strong level of similarity and organization among group members (i.e., group entitativity) suggests the existence of a deep essence that would account for the detected regularities. Conversely, the existence of naïve theories regarding the presence of an underlying core encourages the search for resemblances and connections within the group. After a short presentation of the recent literature dealing with the concepts of entitativity and essentialism, we review a series of studies from our laboratory showing the impact of entitativity on essentialism as well as the influence of essentialism on entitativity. We also provide empirical evidence for this bidirectional process from both the outsider and the insider perspective. Finally, we examine the potential role of cultural differences both in the ascription of a fundamental nature to an entitative assembly of people and in the use of a priori naïve theories to create surface similarity among group members. As a set, these efforts point to the importance of taking into account the constant dialogue between perceiver's theory-based explanations and group member's perceptual characteristics if one wishes to understand group stereotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,259
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
(2013) · Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0 · Cited by 7,486
Individualism and Collectivism
(1976) · The Road to Serfdom · doi:10.4324/9780203991718-8 · Cited by 6,058
Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · Cited by 5,933
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
Individualism and collectivism
Oetzel, J. G. (1996) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(96)83678-9 · Cited by 3,781
The role of theories in conceptual coherence.
Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.92.3.289 · Cited by 2,792
Norman, W. T. (1963) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040291 · Cited by 2,485
The person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3604 · Cited by 2,208
Cited by
Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents
Benet‐Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x · Cited by 1,384
The Specificity Principle in Acculturation Science
Bornstein, M. H. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616655997 · Cited by 394
Psychological Essentialism of Human Categories
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2007) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00504.x · Cited by 371
Vicarious retribution: the role of collective blame in intergroup aggression
Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D. M., Denson, T. F., & Schmader, T. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6 · Cited by 345
Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.1 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-155
- ISSN
- 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7957
- OpenAlex
- W2163706405
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 88
- FWCI
- 42.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327957pspr0502_5
- The paper
- Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. (2001). The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0502_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.