Cited by 304Action Observation and SynchronizationEmbodied and Extended CognitionSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

If They Move in Sync, They Must Feel in Sync: Movement Synchrony Leads to Attributions of Rapport and Entitativity

Lakens, Daniël, Stel, Mariëlle·2011·Social Cognition

Abstract

Coordinated behavior patterns are one of the pillars of social interaction. Researchers have recently shown that movement synchrony influences ratings of rapport, and the extent to which groups are judged to be a unit. The current experiments investigated the hypothesis that observers infer a shared psychological state from synchronized movement rhythms, influencing attributions of rapport and entitativity judgments. Movement rhythms of observed individuals are manipulated between participants (Experiment 1) or kept constant while the source of the emerging movement synchrony is manipulated (Experiment 2), and both rapport and perceived entitativity are measured. The findings support the assumption that movement synchrony increases attributed rapport and perceived entitativity. Furthermore, mediational analyses reveal that the effects of movement synchrony on perceived unity are not purely perceptual in nature, but caused by psychological inferences. Observers infer the degree to which individuals are a social unit from their movement rhythms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.1

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synchrony is interpreted by observers as a marker of high group cohesion and entitativity.

    “Furthermore, synchrony is interpreted by observers as a marker of high group cohesion and entitativity, suggesting that the association between synchrony and group unity is particularly strong [46,47].”

    From The ice-breaker effect: Singing mediates fast social bonding (2015) · cites this paper as [46]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lakens, D., & Stel, M.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Social Cognition
Published
2011-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112131668
Cited by
304
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
motor synchronization, rapport, entitativity, social perception, interpersonal coordination, movement rhythm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review