Cited by 494Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Cross-Cultural Differences in Physical Aggression Between Partners: A Social-Role Analysis

Archer, John·2006·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

In developed western nations, both sexes commit acts of physical aggression against their partners. Data from 16 nations showed that this pattern did not generalize to all nations. The magnitude and direction of the sex difference was highly correlated with national-level variations in gender empowerment and individualism-collectivism. As gender equality and individualism increased, the sex difference in partner violence moved in the direction of lesserfemale victimization and greater male victimization. A second analysis of 52 nations showed that 3 indexes of women%'s victimization were also inversely correlated with gender equality and individualism. Sexist attitudes and relative approval of wife beating were also associated with women%'s victimization rates, but general levels of violent crime were not. The findings are discussed in terms of a social role approach to variations in sex differences between cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The opposite pattern is seen for Aggressive behavior partners, indicating that the sex difference (i.e., men display higher levels of physical aggression toward their partners) is smaller in countries with higher living conditions, as reported in two studies in the old analyses.

    “The opposite pattern is seen for Aggressive behavior partners, indicating that the sex difference (i.e., men display higher levels of physical aggression toward their partners) is smaller in countries with higher living conditions, as reported in two studies in the old analyses (Archer, 2006; Ebbeler et al., 2017).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Archer, 2006

  • Men also display higher levels of Aggressive behavior partners (SMDs = 0.04-9.075).

    “Men also display higher levels of Aggressive behavior partners (SMDs = 0.04–9.075; Archer, 2006; Ebbeler et al., 2017).”

    From A Systematic Review and New Analyses of the Gender-Equality Paradox (2025) · cites this paper as Archer, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Archer, J.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Archer, John
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2006-05
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
133-153
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2139699549
Cited by
494
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 32
FWCI
13.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
intimate partner violence, physical aggression, cross-cultural comparison, sex differences, gender equality, individualism-collectivism, social role theory, victimization of women, male victimization, sexist attitudes, wife beating, violent crime, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Aggression, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Power, Psychological, Sexual Behavior, Social Behavior, Spouse Abuse, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review