The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling
Abstract
There has been relatively little systematic investigation of the effect of the number of variables on measures of model fit in structural equation modeling. There is conflicting evidence as to whether measures of fit tend to improve or decline as more variables are added to the model. We consider 3 different types of specification error: minor factors, 2-factor models, and method errors. Using a formal method based on the noncentrality parameter (NCP), we find that root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) tends to improve regardless of the type of specification error and that the comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), generally, though not always, tend to worsen as the number of variables in the model increases. The formal method that we develop can be used to investigate other measures of fit and other types of misspecification.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“CFA results show an excellent fit of the data to the hypothesized measurement structure. Specifically, the fit indices for the eight factor model include the comparative fit index (CFI = 0.902), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA = 0.054) and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR = 0.054). All indicate good to excellent fit (27–29).”
From Assessing the sustainability capacity of evidence-based programs in community and health settings (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“With an increasing number of indicators, the CFI increasingly underestimates model fit (Kenny & McCoach, 2003).”
From Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. (2015) · cites this paper as Kenny & McCoach, 2003
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 · Cited by 6,552
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.16 · Cited by 5,512
(1995) · Cited by 4,008
Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · Cited by 3,953
Statistically based tests for the number of common factors
Steiger, J. H. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,413
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. (1984) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294170 · Cited by 1,775
Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540119 · Cited by 1,664
Marsh, H. W. (1987) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2 · Cited by 1,333
Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1 · Cited by 1,307
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732 · Cited by 1,038
Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519509540000 · Cited by 791
Matrices with Applications in Statistics.
Thomas, G. E., & Graybill, F. A. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2981752 · Cited by 744
Item Parceling Strategies in SEM: Investigating the Subtle Effects of Unmodeled Secondary Constructs
Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819923002 · Cited by 710
CFI versus RMSEA: a comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling
Rigdon, E. E. (1996) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519609540052 · Cited by 668
Hollenbeck, J. R., & Williams, C. R. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.606 · Cited by 234
Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2002) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3701_01 · Cited by 137
A method for exploring the effects of attrition in randomized experiments with dichotomous outcomes
Shadish, W., Hu, X.-G., Glaser, R., Kownacki, R. J., & Wong, S. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.1.3 · Cited by 105
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1037//0021-9010.76.5.732 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588 · DOI
- Breivik, E. & Olsson, U. H. (2001). Adding variables to improve model fit: The effect of model size on fit assessment in LISREL. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 169-194). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
- Chau, H. & Hocevar, D. (1995, April). The effects of number of measured variables on goodness- of-fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
- 10.1037//1082-989X.1.1.16 · DOI · Paper page
- Fouladi, R. T. & Steiger, J. H. (1999). Tests of an identity correlation structure. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 167-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- 10.1037//1082-989X.3.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
- 10.1037//0021-9010.71.4.606 · DOI
- Wolfram, S. (1996). The Mathematica book (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008) · Dublin Institute of Technology · doi:10.21427/d7cf7r · Cited by 8,746
Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices
Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000006288127 · Cited by 4,087
The Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom
Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114543236 · Cited by 2,841
Self-citationRefining the theory of basic individual values.
Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., et al. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029393 · Cited by 2,962
Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics
Iacobucci, D. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 · Cited by 2,263
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Venue
- Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-351
- ISSN
- 1070-5511 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-8007
- OpenAlex
- W2034820849
- Cited by
- 1,231
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 30
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- model fit measures, number of variables, model misspecification, two-factor model, method error, noncentrality parameter, comparative fit index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review