CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 234Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the Function of School Refusal Behavior: The School Refusal Assessment Scale

Kearney, Christopher A., Silverman, Wendy K.·1993·Journal of Clinical Child Psychology
DOI 10.1207/s15374424jccp2201_9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Addressed deficiencies of traditional classification approaches to school refusal behavior through the development of the School Refusal Assessment Scale (SRAS). The scale identifies maintaining variables of school refusal behavior, including dimensions of negative and positive reinforcement. Results indicated child and parent versions of the scale to be reliable across time and between parent raters. Correlational data supported the hypothesis that separate functional conditions could be distinguished. The SRAS is proposed as a potentially useful clinical tool for objectively assigning prescriptive treatment strategies for this population. Recommendations for further research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15374424jccp2201_9

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hersov, L. (1985). School refusal. In M. Rutter & L. Hersov (Eds.), Child and adolesce~zt psychiatry. Modern approaches (pp. 382-399). Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  2. Kearney, C. A. & Silverman, W. K. (1991, May). Assessing the determinants of school rqfusal behavior. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Atlanta, GA.
  3. Kovacs, M. & Beck, A. T. (1977). An empirical-clinical approach toward a definition of childhood depression. In J. G. Schulterbrandt & A. Raskin r(Eds.), Depression in children: Diagnosis, treatment, and conceptual models (pp. 1-25). New York: Raven.
  4. Rutter, M. & Tuma, A. M. (1988). Diagnosis and classification: Some outstanding issues. In M. Rutter, A. M. Tuma, & I. S. Lann (Eds.), Assessment (and diagnosis in child,psychopathtology (pp. 437-452). Nelw York: Guilford.
  5. Spielberger, C. D. (1973). Man,ualJ6r the State-Trait Anxiety Iitventory for Children. Palo Alto, CA: Consullting Psychologists Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–234 of 234

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kearney, C. A., & Silverman, W. K.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1993-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
85-96
ISSN
0047-228X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1207/s15374424jccp2201_9
OpenAlex
W2072697307
Cited by
234
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
27.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Clinical Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
school refusal, functional classification, negative reinforcement, positive reinforcement, parent ratings, scale reliability, treatment planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review