The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning From the Web Versus Print
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that Web delivery may produce less learning than traditional print. Left unanswered are questions of the process through which differences are produced. Using 2 theories user control and structural isomorphism-we proposed 2 mediators of the influence of medium on learning. Path analysis of experimental data varying medium while holding content constant suggested that the Web increases learning through increased elaboration, but decreases learning through increased selective scanning compared to traditional print.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141
The limited capacity model of mediated message processing
Lang, A. (2000) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x · Cited by 2,153 · cited 1×
“Although some have suggested theoretical reasons for doing so (e.g., Lang, 2000), we were unable to separate our measure of knowledge into dimensions of recognition (trudalse and = .39).”
BackgroundSalomon, G. (1984) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.647 · Cited by 1,015
Kinzie, M. B. (1990) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02298244 · Cited by 181
Cited by
EVELAND, W. P. (2001) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365001028005001 · Cited by 499
All Joking Aside: A Serious Investigation into the Persuasive Effect of Funny Social Issue Messages
Nabi, R. L., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Byrne, S. (2007) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750701196896 · Cited by 431
EFFECTS OF INTERACTIVITY IN A WEB SITE: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition
Sicilia, M., Ruiz, S., & Munuera, J. L. (2005) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639202 · Cited by 388
TELEVISION AND WEB ADVERTISING SYNERGIES
Chang, Y., & Thorson, E. (2004) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2004.10639161 · Cited by 306
Hypertext fiction reading: haptics and immersion
Mangen, A. (2008) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00380.x · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Eveland, Jr., & Dunwoody, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-53
- ISSN
- 0883-8151 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6878
- OpenAlex
- W2071337568
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning From the Web Versus Print. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_3
- The paper
- Eveland, Jr., & Dunwoody, S. (2002). An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning From the Web Versus Print. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.