Cited by 139Sexual Differentiation and DisordersEstrogen and related hormone effectsNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Sex Differences in Androgen Receptors and Aromatase Activity in Microdissected Regions of the Rat Brain*

ROSELLI, CHARLES E.·1991·Endocrinology

Abstract

Males are generally more responsive than females to the behavioral and neuroendocrine actions of androgens. The present experiments were performed to determine whether these differences may result from sex differences in the number of androgen receptors (AR) in specific brain areas. For this reason, AR binding was compared in both cytosol (ARc) and cell nuclear KCl extracts (ARn) from microdissected brain regions of gonadectomized male and female rats treated with doses of testosterone (T) that produced equivalent physiological circulating androgen levels. In addition, microsomal aromatase activity was measured as a biochemical index of tissue responsiveness to T, since estrogen formation in certain brain areas is regulated by androgen. One week after exogenous T administration, males exhibited significantly higher levels of ARn than females in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, periventricular preoptic area, and ventromedial nucleus. Males also had significantly higher aromatase levels in these same areas plus the medial preoptic nucleus and anterior hypothalamus. There were no significant differences in ARn concentrations in eight other nuclei that were examined for significant sex differences in ARc levels observed under these experimental conditions. When ARc levels were compared in untreated gonadectomized male and female rats, males had greater levels of ARc in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis only, indicating that new receptor synthesis may be responsible…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/endo-128-3-1310

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROSELLI, C. E.
Affiliations
Oregon National Primate Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
ROSELLI, CHARLES E.
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
1991-03
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
1310-1316
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2156986289
Cited by
139
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29hd023293-05)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30 HD-18185, HD-23293, P30HD018185)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
androgen receptor, aromatase, sex differences, androgen response, testosterone, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, preoptic area, ventromedial hypothalamus, hypothalamus, gonadectomy, receptor synthesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Aromatase, Brain, Castration, Dissection, Female, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Receptors, Androgen, Sex Characteristics, Tissue Distribution, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review