Cited by 89Sexual Differentiation and DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Expression of the nuclear receptor coactivator, cAMP response element-binding protein, is sexually dimorphic and modulates sexual differentiation of neonatal rat brain

Open access
Auger, A. P., Perrot-Sinal, T. S., Auger, C. J., Ekas, L. A., Tetel, M. J., McCarthy, M. M.·2002·Endocrinology

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that the transcriptional activity of steroid receptors is governed by proteins called nuclear receptor coactivators. Using immunocytochemistry, we found that on the day of birth (postnatal d 0) males express higher levels of the nuclear receptor coactivator, cAMP response element binding protein-binding protein (CBP), within the ventromedial hypothalamus, medial preoptic area, and arcuate nucleus. Using Western immunoblots, we confirmed that males have higher levels of CBP on postnatal d 0, 1, and 5; however, there was no sex difference on postnatal d 11. To examine the functional role of CBP, we infused oligodeoxynucleotides that were antisense to CBP mRNA or a scrambled sequence as a control into the hypothalamus of female rats on postnatal d 0, 1, and 2. On postnatal d 1, all rats were injected with 100 microg testosterone propionate to both masculinize (increase male) and defeminize (decrease female) sexual behavior. Rats were ovariectomized in adulthood and tested for adult sexual behavior. Neonatal CBP antisense oligodeoxynucleotides treatment interfered with the defeminizing, but not the masculinizing, actions of testosterone. These results indicate that CBP expression in developing rat brain is sexually dimorphic and an important modulator for steroid hormone action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/endo.143.8.8975

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. [1]Pfaff DW, Schwartzgiblin S, McCarthy MM, Kow LM. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of female reproductive behaviors. In: Knobil E, JD Neill, editors. Physiology of reproduction. 2nd ed. vol 1. Raven Press; New York: 1994. pp. 2107–2120. [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Blaustein JD, Olster DH. Gonadal steroid hormone receptors and social behaviors. In: Balthazart J, editor. Advances in comparative and environmental physiology. vol 3. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1989. pp. 31–104. [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:451–486. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.002315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [4]Shibata H, Spencer TE, Onate SA, Jenster G, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Role of co-activators and co-repressors in the mechanism of steroid/ thyroid receptor action. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1997;52:141–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]McKenna NJ, Lanz RB, O'Malley BW. Nuclear receptor coregulators: cellular and molecular biology. Endocr Rev. 1999;20:321–344. doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.3.0366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. [6]Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science. 1995;270:1354–1357. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5240.1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. [8]Chrivia JC, Kwok RP, Lamb N, Hagiwara M, Montminy MR, Goodman RH. Phosphorylated CREB binds specifically to the nuclear protein CBP. Nature. 1993;365:855–859. doi: 10.1038/365855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  8. [9]Molenda HA, Griffen AL, Auger AP, McCarthy MM, Tetel MJ. Nuclear receptor coactivators modulate hormone-dependent gene expression in brain and female reproductive behavior in rats. Endocrinology. 2002;143:436–444. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.2.8659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. [10]Smith CL, Onate SA, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. CREB binding protein acts synergistically with steroid receptor coactivator-1 to enhance steroid receptor-dependent transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:8884–8888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.17.8884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. [11]Spencer TE, Jenster G, Burcin MM, Allis CD, Zhou J, Mizzen CA, McKenna NJ, Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Steroid receptor coactivator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature. 1997;389:194–198. doi: 10.1038/38304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. [13]Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. The CBP co-activator is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature. 1996;384:641–643. doi: 10.1038/384641a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. [14]Oike Y, Takakura N, Hata A, Kaname T, Akizuki M, Yamaguchi Y, Yasue H, Araki K, Yamamura K, Suda T. Mice homozygous for a truncated form of CREB-binding protein exhibit defects in hematopoiesis and vasculo-angiogenesis. Blood. 1999;93:2771–2779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [15]Oike Y, Hata A, Mamiya T, Kaname T, Noda Y, Suzuki M, Yasue H, Nabeshima T, Araki K, Yamamura K. Truncated CBP protein leads to classical Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome phenotypes in mice: implications for a dominant-negative mechanism. Hum Mol Genet. 1999;8:387–396. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.3.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. [16]Stromberg H, Svensson SP, Hermanson O. Distribution of CREB-binding protein immunoreactivity in the adult rat brain. Brain Res. 1999;818:510–514. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01219-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. 17.>Murphy DD, Segal M. Morphological plasticity of dendritic spines in central neurons is mediated by activation of cAMP response element binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:1482–1487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. [18]Mong JA, Glaser E, McCarthy MM. Gonadal steroids promote glial differentiation and alter neuronal morphology in the developing hypothalamus in a regionally specific manner. J Neurosci. 1999;19:1464–1472. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-04-01464.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. [19]Matsumoto A, Arai Y. Sexual dimorphism in `wiring pattern' in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus and its modification by neonatal hormonal environment. Brain Res. 1980;190:238–242. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91173-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. [20]Baum MJ. Differentiation of coital behavior in mammals: a comparative analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1979;3:265–284. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(79)90013-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. [21]Cooke B, Hegstrom CD, Villeneuve LS, Breedlove SM. Sexual differentiation of the vertebrate brain: principles and mechanisms. Front Neuroendocrinol. 1998;19:323–362. doi: 10.1006/frne.1998.0171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  20. [23]Whalen RE, Edwards DA. Hormonal determinants of the development of masculine and feminine behavior in male and female rats. Anat Rec. 1967;157:173–180. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091570208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. [24]Wilson JG, Hamilton JB, Young WC. Influence of age and presence of the ovaries on reproductive function in rats injected with androgens. Yale J Biol Med. 1940;13:189–202. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [25]Feder HH, Phoenix CH, Young WC. Suppression of feminine behaviour by administration of testosterone propionate to neonatal rats. J Endocrinol. 1966;34:131–132. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0340131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. [27]Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. compact ed 3 Academic Press; Sydney, Australia: 1997. [Google Scholar]
  24. [28]Auger AP, Meredith JM, Snyder GL, Blaustein JD. Oestradiol increases phosphorylation of a dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein (DARPP-32) in female rat brain. J Neuroendocrinol. 2001;13:761–768. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2001.00700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  25. [29]Auger AP, Perrot-Sinal TS, McCarthy MM. Excitatory versus inhibitory GABA as a divergence point in steroid-mediated sexual differentiation of the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8059–8064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.131016298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [30]Horwitz KB, Jackson TA, Bain DL, Richer JK, Takimoto GS, Tung L. Nuclear receptor coactivators and corepressors. Mol Endocrinol. 1996;10:1167–1177. doi: 10.1210/mend.10.10.9121485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [31]Fronsdal K, Engedal N, Slagsvold T, Saatcioglu F. CREB binding protein is a coactivator for the androgen receptor and mediates cross-talk with AP-1. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:31853–31859. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.48.31853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  28. [33]MacLusky NJ, Naftolin F. Sexual differentiation of the central nervous system. Science. 1981;211:1294–1302. doi: 10.1126/science.6163211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  29. [34]Vreeburg JT, van der Vaart PD, van der Schoot P. Prevention of central defeminization but not masculinization in male rats by inhibition neonatally of oestrogen biosynthesis. J Endocrinol. 1977;74:375–382. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0740375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  30. [35]Van der Schoot P. Effects of dihydrotestosterone and oestradiol on sexual differentiation in male rats. J Endocrinol. 1980;84:397–407. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0840397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [36]Tonjes R, Docke F, Dorner G. Effects of neonatal intracerebral implantation of sex steroids on sexual behaviour, social play behaviour and gonadotrophin secretion. Exp Clin Endocrinol. 1987;90:257–263. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1210699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  32. [37]Davis PG, Chaptal CV, McEwen BS. Independence of the differentiation of masculine and feminine sexual behavior in rats. Horm Behav. 1979;12:12–19. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(79)90022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  33. [38]Sodersten P. Effects of anti-oestrogen treatment of neonatal male rats on lordosis behaviour and mounting behaviour in the adult. J Endocrinol. 1978;76:241–249. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.0760241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  34. [39]McCarthy MM, Schlenker EH, Pfaff DW. Enduring consequences of neonatal treatment with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid on sexual differentiation of rat brain. Endocrinology. 1993;133:433–439. doi: 10.1210/endo.133.2.8344188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  35. [40]Brand T, Slob AK. Perinatal flutamide and mounting and lordosis behavior in adult female Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats. Behav Brain Res. 1991;44:43–51. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80238-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  36. [41]Ward IL, Renz FJ. Consequences of perinatal hormone manipulation on the adult sexual behavior of female rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972;78:349–355. doi: 10.1037/h0032375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  37. [42]Perakis A, Stylianopoulou F. Effects of a prenatal androgen peak on rat brain sexual differentiation. J Endocrinol. 1986;108:281–285. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1080281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  38. [43]Clemens LG, Gladue BA, Coniglio LP. Prenatal endogenous androgenic influences on masculine sexual behavior and genital morphology in male and female rats. Horm Behav. 1978;10:40–53. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(78)90023-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  39. [44]Morris M, Lucion AB. Antisense oligonucleotides in the study of neuroendocrine systems. J Neuroendocrinol. 1995;7:493–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.1995.tb00787.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  40. [45]Zhou Y, Watters JJ, Dorsa DM. Estrogen rapidly induces the phosphorylation of the cAMP response element binding protein in rat brain. Endocrinology. 1996;137:2163–2166. doi: 10.1210/endo.137.5.8612562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  41. [46]Carlstrom L, Ke Z, Unnerstall JR, Cohen RS, Pandey SC. Estrogen modulation of the cyclic AMP response element-binding protein pathway: effects of long-term and acute treatments. Neuroendocrinology. 2001;74:227–243. doi: 10.1159/000054690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  42. [47]Gu GB, Rojo AA, Zee MC, Yu JH, Simerly RB. Hormonal regulation of CREB phosphorylation in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus. J Neurosci. 1996;16:3035–3044. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-09-03035.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  43. [48]Auger AP, Hexter DP, McCarthy MM. Sex difference in the phosphorylation of cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) in neonatal rat brain. Brain Res. 2001;890:110–117. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)03151-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auger, A. P., Perrot-Sinal, T. S., Auger, C. J., Ekas, L. A., Tetel, M. J., & McCarthy, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Skidmore College (US)
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
143
Issue
8
Pages
3009-3016
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2161218552
Cited by
89
References
5
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Wellesley College Digital RepositoryWellesley (Wellesley College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH002035, R29MH052716, MH 02035, MH 52716, Z01MH002035, R01MH052716)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK61935, R55DK061935, R01DK061935)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
CREB, CBP, nuclear receptor coactivators, sexual differentiation of the brain, sexually dimorphic gene expression, neonatal brain development, hypothalamus, medial preoptic area, arcuate nucleus, testosterone, masculinization, defeminization, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, steroid hormone action, sex differences
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Immunohistochemistry, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Sex Characteristics, Sex Differentiation, Testosterone, Transcription Factors, Blotting, Western, Trans-Activators, Oligonucleotides, Antisense, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein, CREB-Binding Protein, Rats, Activating Transcription Factor 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review