Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,105

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Cues to Implantation

Open access
Dey, S. K., Lim, H., Das, Sanjoy K., Reese, Jeff, Paria, B. C., Daikoku, Takiko, Wang, Haibin·2004·Endocrine Reviews

Abstract

Successful implantation is the result of reciprocal interactions between the implantation-competent blastocyst and receptive uterus.Although various cellular aspects and molecular pathways of this dialogue have been identified, a comprehensive understanding of the implantation process is still missing.The receptive state of the uterus, which lasts for a limited period, is defined as the time when the uterine environment is conducive to blastocyst acceptance and implantation.A better understanding of the molecular signals that regulate uterine receptivity and implantation competency of the blastocyst is of clinical relevance because unraveling the nature of these signals may lead to strategies to correct implantation failure and improve pregnancy rates.Gene expres-sion studies and genetically engineered mouse models have provided valuable clues to the implantation process with respect to specific growth factors, cytokines, lipid mediators, adhesion molecules, and transcription factors.However, a staggering amount of information from microarray experiments is also being generated at a rapid pace.If properly annotated and explored, this information will expand our knowledge regarding yet-to-be-identified unique, complementary, and/or redundant molecular pathways in implantation.It is hoped that the forthcoming information will generate new ideas and concepts for a process that is essential for maintaining procreation and solving major reproductive health issues in women.(Endocrine Reviews 25: 341-373, 2004) I. Introduction II.Preimplantation Embryo Development and Genomic Activation III.Species-Specific Morphological Blueprint and Timing of Implantation IV.Delayed Implantation V. Window of Implantation: A Transient and Unique Moment VI.Embryo-Uterine Signaling Pathways in Implantation A. Steroid hormone signaling B. Signaling via adhesion molecules: cell-cell interactions C. Signaling by vasoactive factors D. Signaling by growth factors E. Signaling by cytokines F. Homeobox genes in implantation G. Ligand-dependent nuclear receptors and coactivators in implantation H. Cell cycle regulation and signaling in implantation and decidualization I. Matrix remodeling and angiogenesis during implantation and decidualization VII.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/er.2003-0020

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 1,105

Metadata

Authors
Dey, S. K., Lim, H., Das, S. K., Reese, J., Paria, B. C., Daikoku, T., & Wang, H.
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
341-373
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2131074211
Cited by
1,105
References
18
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Cues to Implantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/er.2003-0020
The paper
Dey, S. K., Lim, H., Das, S. K., Reese, J., Paria, B. C., Daikoku, T., & Wang, H. (2004). Molecular Cues to Implantation. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2003-0020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.