Cited by 36Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Comparison of four different protocols of I-131 therapy for treating single toxic thyroid nodule

Zakavi, Seyed Rasoul, Mousavi, Zohreh, Davachi, Behroze·2009·Nuclear Medicine Communications

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare low and high doses as well as fixed and calculated doses of I-131 in treating toxic thyroid adenoma. METHODS AND PATIENTS: In a prospective study, patients with hyperthyroidism and a single hot thyroid nodule and 24-h radioactive iodine uptake of more than 25% were randomly treated with one of four protocols: fixed low dose (FLD, 481 MBq), fixed high dose (FHD, 832 MBq), calculated low dose (CLD, 3.33-3.70 MBq/g), and calculated high dose (CHD, 6.66-7.4 MBq/g). The patients were asked to visit the endocrinologist 2 and 6 months after treatment and every 6 months thereafter. Clinical exam and laboratory tests were done in all patients during each follow-up. A curative effect was considered as absence of thyroid stimulating hormone suppression (thyroid stimulating hormone>0.3). An analysis of variance test was used for comparison of groups. RESULTS: 97 patients completed the follow-up, eight male, 89 female, with a mean age of 43.3 years (SD=13.4) and mean 24-h radioactive iodine uptake values of 48.07% (SD=14.07). No significant difference was noted in the four groups regarding age, sex ratio, thyroid uptake, and thyroid weight. About 10 months after therapy, cure of hyperthyroidism was higher in CHD group compared with other groups. Hypothyroidism was significantly higher in CHD and FHD groups compared with CLD and FLD groups in all follow-ups. No significant difference was noted in the cure of hyperthyroidism between CLD and FLD groups. Mean radioiodine dose administered in calculated groups was significantly less than fixed dose groups. CONCLUSION: CHD protocol is preferable in old patients with toxic adenoma whereas CLD is more appropriate in young patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mnm.0b013e3283169148

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zakavi, S. R., Mousavi, Z., & Davachi, B.
Affiliations
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Zakavi, Seyed Rasoul
Venue
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Published
2009-02
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
169-175
ISSN
0143-3636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023537069
Cited by
36
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nuclear Medicine Communications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
radioiodine therapy, iodine-131, toxic adenoma, hyperthyroidism, hot thyroid nodules, fixed dose, dose comparison, TSH suppression, hypothyroidism, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Iodine Radioisotopes, Male, Thyroid Nodule, Treatment Outcome, Radiopharmaceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review