The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current Approaches and Recommended Algorithm for the Diagnostic Localization of Pheochromocytoma
Abstract
PHEOCHROMOCYTOMAS (PHEO) (1–3) are catecholamine-producing tumors that arise from chromaffin cells. PHEO are mostly situated within the adrenal medulla, although in about 9–23% of cases, tumors develop from extraadrenal chromaffin tissue (adjacent to sympathetic ganglia of the neck, mediastinum, abdomen, and pelvis) and are often referred to as paragangliomas (4–6). PHEO situated in the adrenal gland are identified more commonly than those in extraadrenal tissues, because clinicians usually focus on the adrenal gland as a main source of catecholamine production. Although they usually choose a proper imaging technique to attempt the localization of PHEO in the adrenal gland, they are often confused as to which algorithm to follow and what technique to choose for the detection of extraadrenal PHEO. Furthermore, physicians often neglect the facts that up to approximately 25% of patients with apparent sporadic PHEO may, in fact, be carriers of germline mutations, indicating hereditary disease with a predisposition for extraadrenal, often multifocal, PHEO (7); that in children, multifocal and extraadrenal PHEO are found in up to 30–43% of cases (6, 8–12); that malignant PHEO account for up to 26–35% of cases (13–18); that the prevalence of malignancy in sporadic adrenal PHEO is 9% (5); and that about 10% of patients with PHEO present with metastatic disease at the time of their initial work-up (19). After initial failed surgery, patients with metastatic PHEO are commonly reevaluated using metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy, a modality that should actually be performed before surgery to confirm that a tumor was indeed a PHEO (5–9% of the population harbor an adrenal tumor, most commonly a benign adenoma) (20–22) or to rule out metastatic disease. These patients are then reoperated upon, suffering additional surgery-related complications and substantial financial expenses. Some clinicians consider the presence of sporadic unilateral small PHEO as indicative of benign disease. This was concluded in older studies of series of patients with PHEO (23–25). However, more recent works from large series of patients with benign and malignant disease in the United States and Europe do not support this view; rather, they support the opinion that there are no absolute clinical, imaging, or laboratory criteria to predict malignancy and clinical course of PHEO (5, 16, 19, 26–32). Nevertheless, PHEO tumors with a diameter larger than 5 cm have a higher potential to metastasize, and such patients should be followed more frequently (33). Consequently, it seems that ruling out metastatic PHEO before initial surgery would be useful, because the detection of other lesions may dramatically affect treatment and follow-up. Localization of PHEO should be attempted using at least two imaging modalities. Anatomical imaging studies [computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] should be combined with functional (nuclear medicine) imaging studies for optimal results to locate primary, recurrent, or metastatic PHEO. Functional imaging studies (enabled by the presence of the noradrenergic transporter system on PHEO cells) include [123I]- or [131I]MIBG scintigraphy, 6-[18F]fluorodopamine ([18F]DA), [18F]dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]DOPA), [11C]hydroxyephedrine, and [11C]epinephrine positron emission tomography (PET) (34–38). Chromaffin cells in various neuroendocrine tissues [such as PHEO, but also medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC)] express the plasma membrane norepinephrine transporter and the intracellular vesicular monoamine transporter. The norepinephrine transporter is responsible for the cellular uptake of both MIBG (39) and [18F]DA (36). We have recently shown that [18F]DA PET scanning could theoretically represent yet another imaging modality for the detection of MTCs (40) because MTC cells often express the norepinephrine transporter and concentrate MIBG (41). In most cases, functional imaging modalities are either able to confirm that a tumor is a PHEO or can lead to further diagnostic work-up. For example, in a patient with positive plasma metanephrines and MIBG imaging studies showing uptake in extraadrenal locations, the possible presence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2)-related tumors (including MTC) should be considered and assessed with measurement of serum calcitonin and/or RET mutations. Functional imaging studies are also very helpful to rule out metastatic disease in most cases. However, as malignant PHEO may undergo tumor dedifferentiation with loss of specific neurotransmitter transporters (Refs. 42 and 43 , and Pacak, K., unpublished observation), leading to the inability to accumulate these isotopes and consequent lack of localization, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) PET scanning or somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (Octreoscan) may be required as the next step of the imaging algorithm. [18F]FDG is a nonspecific imaging agent whose accumulation is based on the higher metabolic
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Krenning, E. P., Kwekkeboom, D. J., Bakker, W. H., Breeman, W. A. P., Kooij, P. P. M., Oei, H. Y., van Hagen, M., Postema, P. T. E., de Jong, M., Reubi, J. C., et al. (1993) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf00181765 · Cited by 1,564
Germ-Line Mutations in Nonsyndromic Pheochromocytoma
Neumann, H. P. H., Bausch, B., McWhinney, S. R., Bender, B. U., Gimm, O., Franke, G., Schipper, J., Klisch, J., Altehoefer, C., Zerres, K., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa020152 · Cited by 1,367
Biochemical Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma: Which Test Is Best?
Lenders, J. W. M., Pacak, K., Walther, M. M., Linehan, W. M., Mannelli, M., Friberg, P., Keiser, H. R., Goldstein, D. S., & Eisenhofer, G. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.11.1427 · Cited by 1,134
Self-citationPeptide Receptors as Molecular Targets for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy
Reubi, J. C. (2003) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0007 · Cited by 1,131
Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma")
Grumbach, M. M., Biller, B. M. K., Braunstein, G. D., Campbell, K. K., Carney, J. A., Godley, P. A., Harris, E. L., Lee, J. K. T., Oertel, Y. C., Posner, M. C., et al. (2003) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-5-200303040-00013 · Cited by 945 · cited 1×
“Adrenal masses are present in about 5–9% of the general population (21, 22, 116, 117).”
BackgroundIncidentally Discovered Adrenal Masses*
KLOOS, R. T., GROSS, M. D., FRANCIS, I. R., KOROBKIN, M., & SHAPIRO, B. (1995) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-16-4-460 · Cited by 828
The Role of Somatostatin and Its Analogs in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Tumors
LAMBERTS, S. W. J., KRENNING, E. P., & REUBI, J.-C. (1991) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-12-4-450 · Cited by 805
Thompson, L. D. R. (2002) · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/00000478-200205000-00002 · Cited by 715
Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature
Boland, G. W., Lee, M. J., Gazelle, G. S., Halpern, E. F., McNicholas, M. M., & Mueller, P. R. (1998) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648789 · Cited by 693
Adrenal Masses: Characterization with Combined Unenhanced and Delayed Enhanced CT
Caoili, E. M., Korobkin, M., Francis, I. R., Cohan, R. H., Platt, J. F., Dunnick, N. R., & Raghupathi, K. I. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2223010766 · Cited by 690
Cited by
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Authors/Task Force Members:, Mancia, G., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., Cifkova, R., Fagard, R., Germano, G., Grassi, G., Heagerty, A. M., Kjeldsen, S. E., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm236 · Cited by 2,384
Zeiger, M. A., Thompson, G. B., Duh, Q.-Y., Hamrahian, A. H., Angelos, P., Elaraj, D., Fishman, E., Kharlip, J., Zeiger, M. A., Thompson, G. B., et al. (2009) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep.15.s1.1 · Cited by 499
Avram, A. M., Fig, L. M., & Gross, M. D. (2006) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2006.03.004 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Ilias, I., & Pacak, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 479-491
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2022313726
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 24.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current Approaches and Recommended Algorithm for the Diagnostic Localization of Pheochromocytoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2003-031091
- The paper
- Ilias, I., & Pacak, K. (2004). Current Approaches and Recommended Algorithm for the Diagnostic Localization of Pheochromocytoma. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-031091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.