Cited by 66Adrenal Hormones and DisordersMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors

Adrenal gland scintigraphy

Avram, Anca M., Fig, Lorraine M., Gross, Milton D.·2006·Seminars in Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

There is no question that high-resolution imaging techniques have revolutionized the approach to diagnostic imaging. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging provide exquisite images of the adrenal glands and offer the best initial imaging approach in the evaluation of patients with suspected adrenal disease. However, an assessment of anatomy is only a portion of the diagnostic effort, which begins with a biochemical evaluation to establish the presence of adrenal gland dysfunction. With a confirmed biochemical diagnosis in hand, a logical and stepwise diagnostic approach can be tailored to a particular patient. Where scintigraphy fits in the evaluation of diseases of the adrenal cortex and medulla in the context of high-resolution imaging and which radiopharmaceuticals should be deployed has changed substantially during the last 2 decades. Adrenal functional imaging has evolved from classic planar scintigraphy to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) using tracers that, by targeting specific metabolic or synthetic processes within the gland, have depicted adrenal pathophysiology. New PET/CT and SPECT/CT technologies integrate anatomic and functional information and redefine the radiotracer principle in the larger context of high resolution anatomic imaging.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2006.03.004

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MIBG has been used for functional imaging of tumors arising from the adrenal medulla for over 30 years.

    “Iodine-labelled metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), a guanethidine analog, has been used for functional imaging of tumors arising from the adrenal medulla for over 30 years (371).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [371]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avram, A. M., Fig, L. M., & Gross, M. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Avram, Anca M.
Venue
Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
212-227
ISSN
0001-2998 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969707415
Cited by
66
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Nuclear Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Keywords
adrenal scintigraphy, adrenal cortex dysfunction, adrenal medulla, adrenal medulla tumors, adrenal incidentaloma, radiopharmaceuticals, SPECT/CT, PET/CT, functional imaging
MeSH terms
Adrenal Gland Diseases, Adrenal Gland Neoplasms, Adrenal Glands, Cushing Syndrome, Female, Humans, Hyperaldosteronism, Iodine Radioisotopes, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Paraganglioma, Pheochromocytoma, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Ultrasonography, Virilism, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, 3-Iodobenzylguanidine, Incidental Findings, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review