Cited by 39Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingHormonal and reproductive studiesCriminal Law and Policy

Ethical and medical considerations of androgen deprivation treatment of sex offenders

Gooren, Louis J.·2011·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context Blood testosterone codetermines the threshold for erotosexual imagery and sexual activity. Androgen deprivation may therefore have a place in the treatment of unacceptable sexual behavior. Although androgen deprivation can be effective for sex offenders, their basic human rights must be respected; otherwise such treatment constitutes a violation of their physical integrity and is ethically unacceptable. As experience in treating prostate cancers demonstrates, androgen deprivation may have serious side effects. Endocrinologists are qualified to advise on and monitor androgen deprivation, but they are placed in an atypical position because the indication for such treatment is not dictated by endocrine disease. Objective The aim of this study was to provide an ethical framework for advising on androgen deprivation treatment of sex offenders and dealing with side effects. Evidence acquisition and synthesis A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Psychinfo, and references from the multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on this topic. An attempt has been made to provide an appreciation of the ethical aspects of androgen deprivation in sex offenders, the efficacy of treatment, the potential risks of treatment, therapeutic options, and recommendations for monitoring treatment. Conclusions Provided that the human rights of sex offenders are respected and informed consent is given, androgen deprivation within a comprehensive framework of psychotherapeutic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2011-1540

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gooren, L. J.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Gooren, Louis J.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2011-12
Volume
96
Issue
12
Pages
3628-3637
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2029432385
Cited by
39
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
androgen deprivation therapy, sexual offenders, recidivism prevention, testosterone, sexual impulse control, human rights, informed consent, treatment side effects, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Androgen Antagonists, Humans, Human Rights, Male, Morals, Sex Offenses, Fractures, Bone, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review