Cited by 721Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and InterventionsChild Abuse and Trauma

What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis

Seto, Michael C., Lalumière, Martin L.·2010·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

We tested special and general explanations of male adolescent sexual offending by conducting a meta-analysis of 59 independent studies comparing male adolescent sex offenders (n = 3,855) with male adolescent non-sex offenders (n = 13,393) on theoretically derived variables reflecting general delinquency risk factors (antisocial tendencies), childhood abuse, exposure to violence, family problems, interpersonal problems, sexuality, psychopathology, and cognitive abilities. The results did not support the notion that adolescent sexual offending can be parsimoniously explained as a simple manifestation of general antisocial tendencies. Adolescent sex offenders had much less extensive criminal histories, fewer antisocial peers, and fewer substance use problems compared with non-sex offenders. Special explanations suggesting a role for sexual abuse history, exposure to sexual violence, other abuse or neglect, social isolation, early exposure to sex or pornography, atypical sexual interests, anxiety, and low self-esteem received support. Explanations focusing on attitudes and beliefs about women or sexual offending, family communication problems or poor parent-child attachment, exposure to nonsexual violence, social incompetence, conventional sexual experience, and low intelligence were not supported. Ranked by effect size, the largest group difference was obtained for atypical sexual interests, followed by sexual abuse history, and, in turn, criminal history, antisocial associations, and substance abuse. We discuss the implications of the findings for theory development, as well as for the assessment, treatment, and prevention of adolescent sexual offending.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019700

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 166 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seto, M. C., & Lalumière, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (CA)
  • University of Lethbridge (CA)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2010
Volume
136
Issue
4
Pages
526-575
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2111458900
Cited by
721
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 39
FWCI
38.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
adolescent sexual offending, male sex offenders, antisocial tendencies, sexual abuse history, childhood abuse, substance use, criminal history, antisocial peers, psychopathology, low self-esteem, parent-child attachment, risk factors for delinquency
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Mental Disorders, Child Abuse, Sexual, Cognition, Family Relations, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Juvenile Delinquency, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Offenses, Violence, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review