Cited by 128Stress Responses and CortisolRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Excessive Sugar Consumption May Be a Difficult Habit to Break: A View From the Brain and Body

Open access

Abstract

CONTEXT: Sugar overconsumption and chronic stress are growing health concerns because they both may increase the risk for obesity and its related diseases. Rodent studies suggest that sugar consumption may activate a glucocorticoid-metabolic-brain-negative feedback pathway, which may turn off the stress response and thereby reinforce habitual sugar overconsumption. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test our hypothesized glucocorticoid-metabolic-brain model in women consuming beverages sweetened with either aspartame of sucrose. DESIGN: This was a parallel-arm, double-masked diet intervention study. SETTING: The study was conducted at the University of California, Davis, Clinical and Translational Science Center's Clinical Research Center and the University of California, Davis, Medical Center Imaging Research Center. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen women (age range 18-40 y) with a body mass index (range 20-34 kg/m(2)) who were a subgroup from a National Institutes of Health-funded investigation of 188 participants assigned to eight experimental groups. INTERVENTION: The intervention consisted of sucrose- or aspartame-sweetened beverage consumption three times per day for 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Salivary cortisol and regional brain responses to the Montreal Imaging Stress Task were measured. RESULTS: Compared with aspartame, sucrose consumption was associated with significantly higher activity in the left hippocampus (P = .001). Sucrose, but not aspartame, consumption associated with reduced (P = .024) stress-induced cortisol. The sucrose group also had a lower reactivity to naltrexone, significantly (P = .041) lower nausea, and a trend (P = .080) toward lower cortisol. CONCLUSION: These experimental findings support a metabolic-brain-negative feedback pathway that is affected by sugar and may make some people under stress more hooked on sugar and possibly more vulnerable to obesity and its related conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2014-4353

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 37 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–128 of 128

Metadata

Authors
Tryon, M. S., Stanhope, K. L., Epel, E. S., Mason, A. E., Brown, R., Medici, V., Havel, P. J., & Laugero, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Nutrition (M.S.T., K.L.S., K.D.L., P.J.H.), California 95616
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Laugero, Kevin D.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2015-06-01
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
2239-2247
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2125159096
Cited by
128
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Dietary Supplements
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (CA 95616, UL1 RR024146)
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl091333-02, CA 95616, RR024146)
  • University of California, Davis (95616, K12 HD051958, CA 95616, RR024146, UL1 RR024146)
  • Agricultural Research Service
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F32HL009133, 1R01HL09133, R01 HL-091333, R01HL121324, HL107256, RR024146, R01HL107256, HL09133)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR-024146, UL1RR024146)
  • Office of Research on Women's Health (K12 HD051958)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (T32AT003997)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD051958)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
sucrose, aspartame, artificial sweeteners, stress response, salivary cortisol, hippocampus, Montreal Imaging Stress Task, naltrexone, nausea, obesity, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Beverages, Brain, Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Obesity, Stress, Psychological, Sweetening Agents, Weight Gain, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review