Cited by 21Lipid metabolism and disordersLipid metabolism and biosynthesisDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Increased VLDL-TG Fatty Acid Storage in Skeletal Muscle in Men With Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Andersen, Iben R., Søndergaard, Esben, Sørensen, Lars P., Nellemann, Birgitte, Gormsen, Lars C., Jensen, Michael D., Nielsen, Søren·2017·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity is considered the rate-limiting step of very-low-density-lipoprotein triglycerides (VLDL-TG) tissue storage, and has been suggested to relate to the development of obesity as well as insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the relationship between the quantitative storage of VLDL-TG fatty acids and LPL activity and other storage factors in muscle and adipose tissue. In addition, we examine whether such relations were influenced by type 2 diabetes. Design: We recruited 23 men (12 with type 2 diabetes, 11 nondiabetic) matched for age and body mass index. Postabsorptive VLDL-TG muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue (abdominal and leg) quantitative storage was measured using tissue biopsies in combination with a primed-constant infusion of ex vivo triolein labeled [1-14C]VLDL-TG and a bolus infusion of ex vivo triolein labeled [9,10-3H]VLDL-TG. Biopsies were analyzed for LPL activity and cellular storage factors. Results: VLDL-TG storage rate was significantly greater in men with type 2 diabetes compared with nondiabetic men in muscle tissue (P = 0.02). We found no significant relationship between VLDL-TG storage rate and LPL activity or other storage factors in muscle or adipose tissue. However, LPL activity correlated with fractional VLDL-TG storage in abdominal fat (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Men with type 2 diabetes have increased VLDL-TG storage in muscle tissue, potentially contributing to increased intramyocellular triglyceride and ectopic lipid deposition. Neither muscle nor adipose tissue storage rates were related to LPL activity. This argues against LPL as a rate-limiting step in the postabsorptive quantitative storage of VLDL-TG.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2016-2979

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In response to 2 days of fasting, triacylglycerols accumulate in the liver of men but in the muscle of women.

    “It has been reported that in response to 2 days of fasting, triacylglycerols accumulate in the liver of men, but in the muscle of women (77)”

    From Sex differences in the metabolism of glucose and fatty acids by adipose tissue and skeletal muscle in humans (2025) · cites this paper as [77]

    The Protocol describes an overnight fast, not two days of fasting. The Abstract and VLDL-TG storage rate section report muscle storage in men with and without type 2 diabetes; they do not report a fasting-induced liver-versus-muscle difference between men and women. Searches for two-day fasting and sex-specific hepatic and muscle triglyceride accumulation found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, I. R., Søndergaard, E., Sørensen, L. P., Nellemann, B., Gormsen, L. C., Jensen, M. D., & Nielsen, S.
Affiliations
  • Departments of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine and
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2016-11-29
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
831-839
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2558169469
Cited by
21
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital
  • Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF09OC1012073, NNF13OC0007893)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
VLDL triglycerides, lipoprotein lipase, skeletal muscle, type 2 diabetes, fatty acid storage, intramyocellular triglyceride, ectopic fat deposition, adipose tissue, insulin resistance, men
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Composition, Carbon Radioisotopes, Coenzyme A Ligases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Lipoprotein Lipase, Lipoproteins, VLDL, Male, Middle Aged, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Triglycerides, Tritium, Absorptiometry, Photon, Case-Control Studies, Muscle, Skeletal, CD36 Antigens, Subcutaneous Fat, Diacylglycerol O-Acyltransferase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review