Cited by 76Ovarian function and disordersHealth and Medical Research Impactsscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Perspectives on polycystic ovary syndrome: Is polycystic ovary syndrome research underfunded?

Open access
Brakta, Soumia, Lizneva, Daria, Mykhalchenko, Kateryna, Imam, Adonis, Walker, Walidah, Diamond, Michael P, Azziz, Ricardo·2017·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine-metabolic abnormality with a worldwide prevalence of 4% to 21%, depending on diagnostic criteria. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest single funding agency in the world; it invests nearly $30.0 billion annually in biomedical research. Evidence Acquisition: Using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting tool, we searched for all grants awarded by the NIH for PCOS and three other disorders with similar degrees of morbidity and similar or lower mortality and prevalence [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), tuberculosis (TB), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)]. Evidence Synthesis: We compared funding by the NIH for PCOS, RA, TB, and SLE research for the years 2006 to 2015, inclusive. Conclusion: PCOS, compared with RA, TB, and SLE, was relatively less funded (total mean 10-year funding was $215.12 million vs $454.39 million, $773.77 million, and $609.52 million, respectively). Funding for PCOS was largely provided by one NIH Institute/Center (ICs) vs at least two ICs for SLE and RA; more individual Research Project Grants were awarded for RA, SLE, and TB than for PCOS, whereas PCOS funding was more likely to be through General Clinical Research Centers Program or Specialized Centers Program awards. Our data suggest that PCOS research may be underfunded considering its prevalence, economic burden, metabolic morbidity, and negative impact on quality of life. Greater education of NIH leaders, including those at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; other federal and state agency leads; elected leaders; and the general public by professional societies, the scientific community, and patient advocates regarding this disorder is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2017-01415

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Danthi N, Wu CO, Shi P, Lauer M. Percentile ranking and citation impact of a large cohort of NHLBI-funded cardiovascular R01 grants. Circ Res. 2014;114(4):600-606.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brakta, S., Lizneva, D., Mykhalchenko, K., Imam, A., Walker, W., Diamond, M. P., & Azziz, R.
Affiliations
  • Augusta University (US)
  • Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center (US)
  • HCA Florida Orange Park Hospital (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Azziz, Ricardo
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2017-09-19
Volume
102
Issue
12
Pages
4421-4427
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2754372557
Cited by
76
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • State University of New York
  • Augusta University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • NIH Clinical Center
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, research funding, NIH grants, rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, research funding disparities, research project grants, patient advocacy
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Quality of Life, Research, Research Support as Topic, United States, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review