The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An amplitude-specific divergence in the pulsatile mode of growth hormone (GH) secretion underlies the gender difference in mean GH concentrations in men and premenopausal women.
Open accessAbstract
Although many studies have discerned higher serum GH concentrations in women than in men, based on measurements of single random blood samples or integrated 24-h means, the neuroendocrine mechanisms that underlie such gender differences have not been defined. Such mechanisms might entail an increase in GH-secretory burst frequency, amplitude, or duration, heightened interpulse basal GH release, or a prolonged half-life of GH. These mechanisms can be distinguished by deconvolution analysis of appropriate GH time series. Earlier studies employed RIA or IRMA with sensitivities of 0.1-0.5 microgram/L, which result in frequently undetectable serum GH concentrations. To address these limitations, we undertook blood sampling at 10-min intervals for 24 h and applied a high-sensitivity immunofluorometric assay of GH (sensitivity 0.0115 microgram/L). Multiparameter deconvolution analysis was used to estimate specific features of GH secretion, while simultaneously calculating the half-life of endogenous GH. Eleven men and 11 premenopausal women from the same community were studied. Discrete peak detection by Cluster was employed as a complementary half-life-independent technique to assign variations in serum GH into pulsatile and basal fractions over 24 h. Cluster revealed significantly higher mean serum GH concentrations over 24 h in women (0.78 +/- 0.08 microgram/L) compared with in men (0.27 +/- 0.03 microgram/L, P < 0.00005). Women exhibited significantly higher maximal serum GH concentration peak values than men (2.08 +/- 0.34 microgram/L in women, 0.67 +/- 0.11 microgram/L in men, P = 0.0008), which could be, in turn, attributed to a significantly increased incremental serum GH peak amplitude (1.85 +/- 0.33 microgram/L in women vs. 0.60 +/- 0.10 microgram/L in men, P = 0.0021) and a longer peak duration (114 +/- 8 min in women, 86 +/- 4 min in men, P = 0.008). The mean area under the serum GH concentration peak was significantly (3-fold) higher in women than in men (98 +/- 17 micrograms/L.min in women, 34 +/- 8 micrograms/L.min in men, P = 0.0046). Serum GH peak frequency was similar in women (9.7 +/- 0.8 peak/24 h) and men (10.7 +/- 1.1 peak/24 h, P = NS). The mechanisms underlying the increase in serum GH concentration pulse amplitude, duration, and area were investigated further by deconvolution analysis. Deconvolution analysis disclosed equivalent secretory pulse frequencies in women and men (13 +/- 0.9 bursts/day in women, 10.5 +/- 1.3 bursts/day in men,P = NS), and statistically indistinguishable mean interburst intervals of 106 +/- 8 min in women and 150 +/- 26 min in men (P = NS). GH-secretory burst mass was significantly higher in women by approximately 2.4-fold (P = 0.0013) compared with in men, which was attributed to a greater burst amplitude. Only low levels of basal GH release were inferred in women (5%) and men (9%), which did not differ significantly between genders. Moreover, the calculated half-life of endogenous GH was no different in women compared with in men: 15.8 +/- 0.7 min vs. 17.1 +/- 0.8 min, respectively (P = NS). The calculated daily secretion rate was 3-fold higher in women (47 +/- 4.8 micrograms/L.24 h) than in men (15 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L.24 h) (P < 0.001). In summary, discrete peak-detection analysis of serum GH concentration profiles collected at 10-min intervals over 24 h in men and premenopausal women discloses significantly different mean serum GH concentrations that are accounted for by higher maximal and incremental serum GH peak amplitudes. Deconvolution analysis demonstrated that the mechanism supporting the amplitude-specific difference in women was an augmentation of the GH-secretory burst mass caused by a higher GH-secretory burst amplitude. These gender differences were highly specific because the frequency of detectable GH-secretory bursts, the calculated endogenous half-life, and the estimated basal GH release were no different in women than in men.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The inference of a stable GH secretory burst-renewal process under E 2 drive would agree with the reported uniformity of GH pulse frequency at different stages of puberty, across the menstrual cycle, and in men and women (3, 7, 17, 57-59).”
From Determinants of dual secretagogue drive of burst-like growth hormone secretion in premenopausal women studied under a selective estradiol clamp (2005) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Zadik, Z., CHALEW, A., McCarter, R., Meistas, M. T., & Kowarski, A. A. (1985) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-60-3-513 · Cited by 596
WEISSBERGER, A. J., HO, K. K. Y., & LAZARUS, L. (1991) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-72-2-374 · Cited by 514
Dawson‐Hughes, B., STERN, D., GOLDMAN, J., & Reichlin, S. (1986) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-63-2-424 · Cited by 250
Chapman, I. M., Hartman, M. L., Straume, M., Johnson, M. L., Veldhuis, P. P., & Thorner, M. O. (1994) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.78.6.8200931 · Cited by 194
Bellantoni, M. F., Harman, S. M., CHO, D. E., & Blackman, M. R. (1991) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-72-1-172 · Cited by 106
Gender influences counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia
Diamond, M. P., Jones, T. W., Caprio, S., Hallarman, L., Connolly-Diamond, M., Addabbo, M., Tamborlane, W. V., & Sherwin, R. S. (1993) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/0026-0495(93)90152-e · Cited by 78
Hormonal Relationships During the Menstrual Cycle
Yen, S. S. C. (1970) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1970.03170090029006 · Cited by 75
Operating behavior of dual or multiple endocrine pulse generators.
Veldhuis, J. D., Lassiter, A. E., & Johnson, M. L. (1990) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1990.259.3.e351 · Cited by 61
Self-citationHindmarsh, P. C., Matthews, D. R., Brain, C. E., Pringle, P. J., Silvio, L. D., Kurtz, A. B., & Brook, C. G. D. (1989) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1989.tb00444.x · Cited by 60
Clinical Pathophysiology of the Somatotropic (GH) Axis in Adults
Iranmanesh, A., & Veldhuis, J. D. (1992) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8529(18)30189-0 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–106 of 106
Impact of Estradiol Supplementation on Dual Peptidyl Drive of GH Secretion in Postmenopausal Women
Veldhuis, J. D., Evans, W. S., & Bowers, C. Y. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.87.2.8251 · Cited by 36
Self-citationSex-steroid control of the aging somatotropic axis
Veldhuis, J. D., Erickson, D., Iranmanesh, A., Miles, J. M., & Bowers, C. Y. (2005) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2005.07.006 · Cited by 30
Self-citationErickson, D., Keenan, D. M., Mielke, K., Bradford, K., Bowers, C. Y., Miles, J. M., & Veldhuis, J. D. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0424 · Cited by 26
Self-citationVeldhuis, J. D., Patrie, J. T., Brill, K. T., Weltman, J. Y., Mueller, E. E., Bowers, C. Y., & Weltman, A. (2004) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0644 · Cited by 25
Self-citationRoelfsema, F., Aoun, P., & Veldhuis, J. D. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2016-2405 · Cited by 23
Self-citationErickson, D., Keenan, D. M., Farhy, L., Mielke, K., Bowers, C. Y., & Veldhuis, J. D. (2005) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2004-1621 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van den Berg, G., Veldhuis, J. D., Frölich, M., & Roelfsema, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2460-2467
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2156478759
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k04hd000634-02, 5p30dk038942-05)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NI-DK-38942)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR 00847, M01RR000847)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (IK04 HD-00634)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- growth hormone secretion, pulsatile secretion, gender differences, deconvolution, premenopausal women, men, neuroendocrine regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Blood Specimen Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Periodicity, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Characteristics, Growth Hormone, Time Factors, Fluoroimmunoassay, Premenopause
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review