Cited by 25Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The N-terminal juxtamembrane segment of the V1a vasopressin receptor provides two independent epitopes required for high-affinity agonist binding and signaling

Open access
Hawtin, Stuart R., Wesley, Victoria J., Simms, John, Argent, Cymone C. H., Latif, Khalid, Wheatley, Mark·2005·Molecular Endocrinology

Abstract

It is fundamentally important to define how agonist-receptor interaction differs from antagonist-receptor interaction. The V1a vasopressin receptor (V1aR) is a member of the neurohypophysial hormone subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. Using alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the N-terminal juxtamembrane segment of the V1aR, we now establish that Glu54 (1.35) is critical for arginine vasopressin binding. The mutant [E54A]V1aR exhibited decreased arginine vasopressin affinity (1700-fold) and disrupted signaling, but antagonist binding was unaffected. Mutation of Glu54 had an almost identical pharmacological effect as mutation of Arg46, raising the possibility that agonist binding required a mutual interaction between Glu54 and Arg46. The role of these two charged residues was investigated by 1) substituting Glu54; 2) inserting additional Glu/Arg in transmembrane helix (TM) 1; 3) repositioning the Glu/Arg in TM1; and 4) characterizing the reciprocal mutant [R46E/E54R]V1aR. We conclude that 1) the positive/negative charges need to be precisely positioned in this N terminus/TM1 segment; and 2) Glu54 and Arg46 function independently, providing two discrete epitopes required for high-affinity agonist binding and signaling. This study explains why Glu and Arg, part of an -R(X3)L/V(X3)E(X3)L- motif, are conserved at these loci throughout this G protein-coupled receptor subfamily and provides molecular insight into key differences between agonist and antagonist binding requirements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/me.2005-0148

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AVP binding involves interactions with amino acid residues in all three extracellular loop elements and residues in the N-terminus proximal to the first TM segment.

    “AVP binding, in contrast, involves interactions with amino acid residues in all three extracellular loop elements and residues in the N-terminus proximal to the first TM segment. (Hawtin et al., 2005; Thibonnier et al., 2000).”

    From Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates (2016) · cites this paper as Hawtin et al., 2005

  • The substitution in marmosets at V45E is adjacent to the highly conserved Arg46.

    “Additionally, the substitution in marmosets at V45E is adjacent to the highly conserved Arg46 (Hawtin et al., 2005).”

    From Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates (2016) · cites this paper as Hawtin et al., 2005

  • Many changes in the V1aR N-terminus are not in the AVP binding region, which is proximal to the first TM segment.

    “It is worth noting that many of the changes in the V1aR N-terminus are not in the AVP binding region, which is proximal to the first TM segment (Hawtin et al., 2005; Thibonnier et al., 2000).”

    From Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates (2016) · cites this paper as Hawtin et al., 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawtin, S. R., Wesley, V. J., Simms, J., Argent, C. C. H., Latif, K., & Wheatley, M.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Wheatley, Mark
Venue
Molecular Endocrinology
Published
2005-11-01
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
2871-2881
ISSN
  • 0888-8809 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-9917
OpenAlex
W2097353938
Cited by
24
References
38
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Sanofi
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Stockholms Universitet
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
vasopressin V1a receptor, receptor signaling, G protein-coupled receptors, alanine scanning, charged residues
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Arginine, Arginine Vasopressin, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Signal Transduction, Mutagenesis, Protein Structure, Secondary, Receptors, Vasopressin, Glutamic Acid, Amino Acid Substitution, Amino Acid Motifs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review